Rolf, Adolf, Collider, Death.
My Russian-language page is more informative.
Switch into Russian
To translate Russian text you can use
translate.google.com.
Due to Emergency the contents of this page is shifted bottom.
February 9, 2010. From my correspondence at
Russian-language forum.
I wrote:
Equation of magnetic hole will be achieved at LHC pB=mc^2.
That means: potential energy (magnetic) = rest energy of proton.
There is no theory of magnetic hole in physics.
Somebody wrote:
Look here (Russian-language article)
http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1878/article_28613.pdf
Magnetic field was computed at collisions of aurum ions at RHIC experiments.
Magnetic flux is quantable in a center of masses reference system, that is why
qB = 2 p k / L2.
According to this formula, (qB)1/2= 348 MeV.
q – electric charge of a quark, L=1.44 fm.
Thanks.
Why here we can see 348 MeV (0.348GeV), but I said that dangerous collisions are collisions with energy 0.25 TeV (250 GeV) per proton, or 510 GeV per collision.
According to my conclusions the minimal dangerous magnetic hole must contain 510 bosons, which can be created at 510 GeV collision. One thirds, or 170 GeV, goes out in the form of radiation, and corresponds to the total binding energy of all bosons inside the hole, or about 1/3 of GeV per every boson.
The mass of every boson inside hole is about 2/3 GeV in energy units.
The number from article, 0.348 GeV corresponds to one quark with the charge 1/3 q. Proton is three-quark (three-polar) structure and for proton we will have the number, which is 3 times bigger, i.e. about 1 GeV.
In a critical magnetic field (1016 T) proton decays at boson and positron. Boson is captured by hole, where his mass is about 2/3 GeV. The rest, 1/3 GeV, goes into kinetic energy of positron and at gamma photon(s).
Why we did not create a magnetic hole till now?
- Try to throw up 100 coins and to receive all 100 “ups” or all 100 “dawns”.
It is possible, but in order to see such picture, you must throw up these 100 coins approximately 2100 times (or 1,27·1030).
No one collider had made this number of collisions.
But the probability can be risen up greatly, if we would raise the energy of collisions.
Or, as they wrote in article: “If magnetic field is defined from qB ~ 1.5 GeV^2, then longitudinal component of a current is much stronger, comparatively to the transverse component, whereas at comparatively weak fields qB ~ 0.3 GeV^2 the enforcement is not observed.” I say that here there is a boundary value of magnetic field for transition of vacuum from antiferromagnetic state into ferromagnetic state.
Conclusion: There are already several little sprouts of magnetic holes theory, but the theory delays drastically comparatively to the experiment. The 20-th February CERN begins work with 3.5 TeV energies per proton. I give 50% that the Earth will be exploded in the nearest weeks.
In January issue of "Chemistry and Life" an article "Black Hole in Collider", written by Sergey Komarov, was published. There he had also mentioned a theory of magnetic hole, which is discussed here.
Several days ago two articles (Higgs hunters face long haul, Law and the end of the world) were published, where I wrote commentaries.
According to my theory of Magnetic Hole (MH), the Earth can be exploded as a result of magnetic collapse at MHs, which can be created at one of proton-proton collisions. The theory is based at two independent and absolutely different math proves, giving almost the same result, - dangerous MHs can be created at p-p collisions with energy about 0.25 TeV per proton, if magnetic moment of x-boson is equal to magnetic moment of proton.
So, I understood that CERN and other scientific organizations, promoting the particle collisions with energies more then 0.1 TeV per particle, can kill me, my relatives, my friends, and my planet. In order to prevent the murder I wrote several letters to authorities of my country and to authorities of other countries. I wrote several letters to Prosecutor’s Office of my country. Most of my letters were resent to Russian Academy of Sciences, where they were thrown into rubbish by a secretary of Nuclear Physics Section of RAS.
Now I do not believe in a possibility of peaceful solution of the problem. I think that courts will not stop the LHC and will not save us. I think that CERN will kill us soon with a probability of about 50%. What can I do to save my relatives and friends? Can I seat silently and wait for a death? Must I take a weapon and kill my potential killers? But how can I live further? I do not want to be a killer and I do not want that particle physicist would kill my people.
Notes:
1. Comparison with cosmic rays is incorrect and criminal.
2. Comparison with 1 TeV Tevatron collisions are incorrect, because magnetic induction in proton-antiproton collisions in the center between colliding particles is zero; in LHC it is doubled and critical.
3. CERN already performed about a million of 0.45 TeV collisions. Are such energy collisions safe? No, - the billionth 0.45 TeV collision can be the last for our planet. CERN already performed about 10 000 of 1.18 TeV collisions. The millionth such collision can be the last. In a several days CERN will make the first 3.5 TeV collision. It can be the last, - the Earth can be exploded.Save yourself, your mother, your children – try to ban collisions with energy more than 0.1 TeV per particle...
January 25, 2010. This portrait is dedicated to CERN decision to start collider work the 20-th of February with energies 3.5 TeV per proton.
Rolf, Adolf, Collider, Death.
January 23, 2010. Remade from my correspondence on a forum about ugly delusional shit of murders, - "Hawking radiation".
Somebody1 wrote: …Ivan, if you have indeed worked out a complete model with calculations, I would suggest you write it up and post it on the physics arXiv. For this you do not need to be a member of a University...
In order to do that I need a couple of endorsers, who will give his signatures for my adequacy. Big Bang murders will not let me to publish an article in any of scientific journals. The whole scientific press now in the dirty clutches of monsters from Fascist Fundamental Science, who call themselves scientists.
Somebody1 wrote: ...if you don't believe in Hawking radiation, there are other chains of reasoning - for instance based on astrophysical evidence...
Another lie. Where is Phaeton?
Somebody2 wrote: I've read all the safety reports hundreds of times and I agree with their conclusions. I just said using Hawking radiation to determine weather or not everyone in the world will die is a bad idea, since it's still theoretical (despite having a good background).
Safety reports contains three crude errors and one lie assertion.
“Hawking radiation”, in fact, describes the luminosity of stars and Sun.
Somebody1 wrote: … black hole *production* … extra dimensions…no one has so far observed Hawking radiation…
You did see the “Hawking radiation” in the form of solar light.
Magnetic holes are “black holes in Kaluza-Klein space-time with extra dimensions, uniting gravity and electroMAGNETISM”. Magnetic holes are 1036 times stronger than gravity holes.
Let’s speak about “Hawking radiation”.
Bell paradox. If two rockets, connected by a string, are accelerated with equal acceleration, then the string would be torn. Or accelerations of rockets must be different.
Unruh and Hawking used this property and come to similar conclusions:
Unruh: T = ħa / 2pkc.
Hawking: T = ħg / 2pkc = ħc3 / 8pkGM.
The second part of Hawking formula describes the temperature of
a black hole of mass M.
The first part of “Hawking formula” can easily be received from the second part,
using Newton mechanics.
Unruh formula and the first part of Hawking formula describe the temperature of
a vacuum, surrounding a particle, which is accelerated relatively vacuum with acceleration
aUnruh or gHawking.
This accelerating particle has a mass m and its Compton wavelength
λc or radius Rc, which are connected
by equation:
mc2 = hc / λc
= ħc / Rc.
Using this formula, we can change the Unruh/Hawking formulae:
T = maRc / 2pk;
T = mgRc / 2pk.
These formulae give Unruh/Hawking temperatures at the depth R, which is equal equal to Compton radius of a particle Rc. On the bottom figure we expanded the validity of these formulae for any depth R. Besides we transformed the formulae from exact form to approximate form, because the substance can consist from particles with different masses and because the substances can be at different states (gas, solid, liquid, the mixture of molecular and photonic parts...).
Left side. Unruh. A rod, accelerating relatively vacuum with acceleration a. Unruh temperature is in the depth R, which is equal to Compton radius of a particle, Rparticle.
Right side. Hawking. Earth crust with a rod in it, accelerating relatively vacuum with acceleration g; that is the same as if the vacuum accelerates relatively you into opposite direction! Hawking temperature is in point R=Rparticle. If a or g are constant, then T ≈ maR/k or T ≈ mgR/k.
If acceleration depends from the depth R, then we must rewrite this formula in differential form:
dT/dR ≈ mg / k.
Increment of depth dR can be substituted by increment of radius dr with opposite sign.
dT/dr ≈ -mg / k.
This is a formula of gravitational temperature gradient. This gradient does not lead to heat exchange between layers. This idea is very old. AFAIK, the first person, who discussed it, was famous physicist Loschmidt. But it was forgotten not only because the formula dT/dr = 0 is simpler, but also because the formula dT/dr ≈ -mg / k ruins the notions, which were supported by religious clerics: "thermal death of Universe", "cemetery of extinct stars", "Big Bang Dogma".
From the other hand, if you substitute the values into the formula dT/dr ≈ -mg / k, you will receive the experimental value of temperature gradient in Earth, which is about 10-30 Kelvin per kilometer. That is an experimental facts, but Big Bang murders rather explode the Earth and kill all of us, than recognize the experimental facts.
The formula dT/dr ≈ -mg/k is valid for any state of substance with the precision to numerical coefficient about 1. This formula is valid for planets and stars. This formula is valid for usual acceleration a, for gravitational acceleration g=GM/R2, for centrifugal acceleration a=v2/r. It explains old puzzles, such as Ranke effect, but it is not accepted by physicists, because it ruins also the most fundamental fascist religion, the Big Bang Dogma.
So, development of Unruh/Hawking formula shows us that there is no any “black hole evaporation” but there are Eternal sources of energy in the Ever Young Universe.
This figure explains why the temperature of gas in the left chamber is greater then in the right chamber.
In fact that was only a small part of a story.
About 1998 I had received a formula of stellar
energy sources. According to my formula the energy output of a star is proportional
to M4/R5. Couple of years ago I understand that my formula
is analogues to Hawking formula, which lead to analogues proportionality: M4/R6.
You can see that proportionality are not the same. The cause: Hawking formula connected
with the surface temperature; my formula is connected with the distribution of matter
along the radius of a star.
Mass proportionalities are the same and almost coincides with observational value:
L~M3.9.
That is another, hundredth prove of Eternal Universe, but its very pity, - in order to prove Big Bang Dogma, fascists from CERN will explode the Earth in 20-40 days with great probability. Dear reader, I wish you happy flight to other star systems of Ever Young Universe.
January 11, 2010. What pilots will save the world, Russian or American?
Quote : ...Kevin "Dow 36000" Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute
calls for the USAF to bomb both France and Switzerland, hoping to get the scientists
in their tunnels before they can destroy the earth...
January 8, 2010. This is not my picture. Perhaps its author is my good friend, supporter.
Citizens! Do not think that some good Uncle Ivan would come and destroy the CERN and its doomsday machine, LHC. Think yourself for your salvation. And not just think, but act. I have no flight experience, no money for the fighter and for a nuclear warhead to bomb the LHC. If you will not stop the CERN now, the CERN will kill all of you in the first quarter of this year, with the probability of about 50%.
I am a physicist. I always respected physicists. Now I hate most of them. They are rogues, cowards, killers, psychic freaks. Damn you, you bastards, academicians, and candidates with the doctors, except for units, my supporters, active supporters of the ban of the experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.January 2, 2010.
From the correspondence on the forum
http://www.lhcportal.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=116&start=135
No! Collision is a vague term. All protons from one bunch constantly interact with all protons of another bunch by exchange with virtual photons and by some other virtual particles. Most of such collisions are elastic and lead only to change of direction of a particle.Somebody wrote: Proton collides with X-boson, positron, electron.
Proton-proton collision, which leads to creation of stable excitation of physical vacuum, can look like this inelastic collision.
Directions of both protons were changed. Moments and kinetic energies of both
protons were diminished. Formula of collision can look like one of these formulae:
p + p --> p + p + M;
p + p --> e+ + e+ + M;
p + p --> μ+ + μ+ + M --> …;
…
Created magnetic hole captures protons; destroy them onto positron and x-boson (or onto μ+ and x-boson, or onto p+ and x-boson); ejects positron (or μ+, or p+) and captures x-boson and grow. Note: x-boson does not consist from two up-quarks, but is rather a leptoquark in Kalusa-Klein space.
December 31, 2009.
Somebody wrote: No, what Ivan is afraid of is some form of magnetic anomaly analogous to a black hole: An anomaly where the magnetic field applied to a dipole exceeds a specified value and (presumably) results in the collapse of the dipole. Apparently this thing then eats protons.
Yes. In the ordinary vacuum different virtual particles constantly appear and disappear. In the bottom figure we can see the appearance of electro-positron pair in the point A and their annihilation in the point B.
In order to transform virtual pair into real pair we must spent energy. On the next figure we can see the x-boson, consisting from two fermions, particle and antiparticle.
If the energy of p-p collision at collider is sufficient we can create an exited region in vacuum containing some quantity of such x-bosons. They are oriented in the same direction and have the superconductive and ferromagnetic properties.
If proton enters into the field of such exited vacuum it can be ruined onto x-boson and positron. X-boson will be captured by magnetic hole and the hole will become bigger per one x-boson. Positron will fly away and annihilate there with some electron. The rate of matter destruction will be growing. The Earth will undergo the collaptical explosion in a period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
...
December 16, 2009. At night they collide protons with energies 1.18 TeV per proton; day - 0.45 TeV. At 18.00 collider was stopped for about a month. Did they already make magnetic holes? If yes, then the Earth will explode in some of next days/months. If not, then CERN will add the energy of particles and quantity of bunches per beam.
...
To read more on this topic open the page Collider, News, Links.
Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations.
Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations.
Steady State Models of the Universe and their Authors
Ever Young Universe
Simplified introduction: In the picture you can see the simplified 2-d water
model as good approximation to the 3-d model of Ever Young Universe. Ships full
of holes, and in the ships there are pumps, spouting the water high up in the sky.
Spouted water drops everywhere in the sea, like a rain...
Genetics of Space Conversions.
Definitions: Light and space are two sides of a coin. Today it shines; tomorrow
it will be medium for another particle-perturbation on the space. One observer sees
the light, the second observer, moving relatively the first, lives in that light
and feels it or measures it as his space-time...
Different forms of space-time transformations. Quantum velocities in Special Relativity.
VB-program http://darkenergy.narod.ru/SR2007.exe proves that the electron is not a point, but a string, embracing the whole Universe in a period, equal to electron's classic period.
Quantum Gravity and Discrete Space-Time-Matter.
Hubble Constant. ...we can conclude, that the Hubble constant with great part of credibility is: H = 73.2+/-0.2 km/s/Mpc. The result H = 73.291882(20) km/s/Mpc is also quite reliable. This follows from my analysis of the movement of electron's links in my VB-program and also from the analysis of my Exel-program http://darkenergy.narod.ru/data.xls, where you can find the more precise value of the gravity constant G = 6.6730079(15)·10-11 Nm2/kg2.
CMB = + Dark Energy. Gravithermal radiation = - Dark Energy.
The Essence of Time & "Age" of Universe
The time is the set of quanta of time, flashes. The conventional age of Universe,
as well as information, are constant. Did you understand? The Age of Universe is
the same, many billion years ago, today, tomorrow, in a billion years, always: T=13.3
billion years. Is it possible?
Concentrations of Galaxies & Quasars
Normalized Units. / SIMechanical Units. / Universal Units
4-D World
4-dimensional space: it's simple! Do you want to play a 4-dimensional football?
Do you want to travel inward or outward?
4d Rotation and Sphere Packing.
Closed Universe. Some people don't understand closed geometry because of the impossibility of imagination of such world. In order to simplify such imagination, I decided to show here my method of imagination of closed three dimensional world in a successive set of pictures...
Computer picture of the closed Universe.
Solar Energy Sources and Bell's spaceship paradox. The expression for energy input, which the massive object receives as a result of absorption of material space-time...
Fine Structure Constant Collection
The pages about The Gravithermal Coil, and Arc Effect.
The core of the Earth is overheated
emptiness.
Try my program The Arc Effect (exe-file, 70kb).
Russian Toroidal Matryoshka & Press-Nuclear
Reactions with catalyst
Energy Klondike
for rational civilization. Inexhaustible nuclear fuel stock
K40
+ p --> Ca40 + n + 0.529 MeV.
K39 + n --> K40
+ 7.8 MeV.
The abstract of a poster speech, which was presented at the conference Science & Future, Moscow, the April 2004: Russian Toroidal Matryoshka is the warm fusion engine of new type.
The following pages are obsolete but they can help to understand the Arc
Effect:
Abstract,
Description,
Formula of Invention,
Gravi-geometric paradox,
Gravitational Mirror
Our Challenge Auto Run. If you are interested in auto runs, adventures, life within the hairbreadths of death, then you must opened this page. Our run Moscow - Magadan - Moscow turned out to be heavier and much more dangerous than the famous Camel Trophy.
The web-site was made: the 10 of June 1998.
