In the mainstream cosmology the Hubble constant characterizes the rate of the Universe expansion, and the Hubble "constant" is changing there with the age of Universe. In this work the Hubble constant characterizes the rate of spacetime macroscopic rotation. Compare: Plank constant characterized the rate of microscopic spacetime rotation. Thus, in this work we have the real Hubble CONSTANT. It has the simplest physical meaning,  frequency of light rotation in closed Universe, Н, measured in rotations per second, or the angular velocity of light, Ħ=2pН. Compare it with Plank constant: ħ=h/(2p). The Hubble constant can be measured in the units used in cosmology, km/s/Mpc.
Method Used  Authors  Value, km/s/Mpc 
Cepheid variables in distant galaxies  W. Freedman et al (1999)  70 +/ 7 
M101 group velocity and distance  Sandage and Tammann (1974)  55.5 +/ 8.7 
Virgo Cluster  Peebles (1977)  42  77 
Globular Clusters  Hanes (1979)  80 +/ 11 
Virgo Sc HII luminosities  Kennicutt (1981)  55 
Type I supernovae  Branch (1979)  56 +/ 15 
Type I supernovae  Sandage and Tammann (1982)  50 +/ 7 
Infrared TullyFisher relation  Aaronson and Mould (1983)  82 +/ 10 
SNIa and Cepheids  Sandage, et al. (1994)  55 +/ 8 
Cepheids in Virgo (M100)  Freedman, et al. (1994)  80 +/ 17 
Surface Brightness Fluctuation  Tully (1993)  90 +/ 10 
Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant 
(2000) W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, B. K. Gibson, L. Ferrarese, D. D. Kelson, S. Sakai, J. R. Mould, R. C. Kennicutt, Jr., H. C. Ford, J. A. Graham, J. P. Huchra, S. M. G. Hughes, G. D. Illingworth, L. M. Macri, P. B. Stetson  72 +/ 8 
In the February, 2003, the results of the first year
of

WMAP Science Team 
Different methods give values: 73 +/ 5 73 +/ 3 

   
Shear Method, ( 
Richard D. Saam (1999)  76 (or 2.47E18 1/sec) 
Stability of Solar system. Quantum numbers for planets was unknown yet. Average value of H was received through: H = Gm/(r^{2}c), where m  masses of a planets or their satellites. 
My result (about 1990)  50100 
Vacuum lattice method. Coefficient was incorrect. Calculated through: H=m_{pr}c^{2}/hN^{2}, N=2/3*sqr(24/(f_{gr}/f_{el})_{ee}*a/3) 
Me and M.Geilhaupt (1998)  64.75 (or 2.099E18 rot/s) 
Vacuum lattice 1999. Calculated through: H=m_{pr}c^{2}/hN^{2}, N^{2}=ap(f_{el}/f_{gr})_{elel} 
My result, (1999)  73.29 (or 2.375E18 rot/s) 
Vacuum lattice 1999G'. Calculated through: H=m_{pr}c^{2}/hN^{2}, N^{2}=ap(f_{el}/f_{gr})_{elel} G' = 1/Exp(a+1/a) = 3.0398509(15)E60 G' = N(f_{gr}/f_{el})_{prel}/(2p^{2}) = 3.0398509(15)E60 G' = (a/e_{0}/G)^{1/2}e/m_{el}/2 = 3.0398509(15)E60 G = (G'e^{3}/4/a^{1/2}/e_{0}^{3/2}/m_{el}/m_{pr}^{2})^{2/3} = 6.671480(24)E11 Nm^{2}/kg^{2} 
My result (November, 1999) 
73.275098(26) (or 2.37468420(84)E18 rot/s) 
Vacuum lattice 2001H. Hydrogen atom was used instead proton. Calculated through: H=m_{H}c^{2}/hN^{2}, N^{2}=ap(f_{el}/f_{gr})_{elel}, m_{H }mass of hydrogen atom 
My result (February, 2001) 
73.32740 (or 2,376378745E18 rot/s) (if G=6.672606660E11 N*kg^{2}/m^{2}) 73.327 
Quantum stability of Solar system. Calculated through: H = Gm/(nr)^{2}/c, where: m  mass of a planet; n  resonant number to which a planet or its satellite trends: Mercury  3, Earth  5, Mars  1, Saturn  5, Uranus  1... 
My result (February, 2001) 
73.314 (if G=6.671480(24)E11 N*kg^{2}/m^{2}) 73.326 
Solar stability Calculated through: L = GM^{2}H/(4l_{0}), where: M  mass of the stable star, M_{Sun} = 1.9891E+30 kg, L luminosity of a star, L_{Sun} = 3.846E+26 W, l_{0}  boundary wave length (look the table on the page Physical Constants), or gravity mirror radius, relatively which two halves of the Sun "expand" accordingly Hubble law. The change of potential energy of two halves of the Sun in one second is equal to the capacity or luminosity of the Sun. 
My result (24 February, 2001) 
73,39 
Alpha method It is known: Rydberg/Bohr = Bohr/Compton = Compton/class. = 1/a. Almost proved hypothesis: ... = Hubble/Schwarzschild = ... = 1/a As a result we have the density of the Universe: r=2aH^{2}/G. (Compare with: r_{GeneralRelativity}=3H^{2}/(8pG); r_{SnakeMethod}=3H^{2}/(64pG). 
My result (29 January, 2002) 
If we use the upper received value of Hubble constant
73.275, we'll have the radiation/gravity pressure ratio about 1.022,
and the temperature of CMB will be smaller then observable in 1.0055
times. If you go back you will have the similar error in the Hubble
constant. (The best temperature for smaller/bigger shifting is: 2.728043K) 
Galaxiesghosts + Alpha method. This result proves the static/stationary models of the Universe build by Einstein, Hoyle, Kozyrev... Hot Big Bang predicts nothing. Stationary model of Universe is much more fruitful and interesting. 
My result (13 February, 2002) 
If we use the upper received value of Hubble constant
73.275098(26) and G = 6.671480(24)E11m^{3}/kg/s^{2},
then we have such characteristics of CMB: u = 4.2039878E14 J/m^{3}, p = 1.4013293E14 Pa, T = 2.7302482 K. Gravithermal spectrum has the same characteristics as the electromagnetic spectrum but with opposite sign. u_{gr} =  u_{em}, 
Grand Unification method. Postulate: Gravity force between two masses, situated on the poles, has an extreme. Consequently, it is described by the same law as three others forces. Relative density of the Universe is it's normalized charge. The square of the normalized charge is the constant of gravity interactions: W^{2} = a_{gr} , At Grand Unification energies these constants converge: a_{gr} = a_{weak} = a_{strong} = (8/3) a_{em}. After some transformations we'll have the connection between the Hubble constant and the CMB temperature: H=16T^{2} sqrt(2Gp^{3}s / (3c^{3}a)). Look the page CMBR = +Dark Energy. 
My result (7 February, 2003) 
If T_{CBR}=2.725(1)K, If the Vacuum lattice 1999 method is
correct, then at first we compute the Hubble constant, H=73.305(11)
km/s/Mpc, and after we compute the CBR temperature: T_{CBR_computed}
= 2.72832(10)K.

Magnetic similarity. The more precise theoretical value of gravity constant was used. G' = 1/Exp(1/a) 
My result (February, 2006) 
H = 73,291909(81) km/s/Mpc = 2,3752290(26) 10^{18} rot/s. 
Unifying the upper results, we can conclude, that the Hubble constant with great part of credibility is:
H = 73.2+/0.2 km/s/Mpc
I think that the result H = 73,291909(81) km/s/Mpc is also quite
reliable. This follows from my analysis of the movement of electron's links in my
VBprogram http://darkenergy.narod.ru/SR2007.exe
And also from the analysis of my Exelprogram
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/data.xls
More precise value of gravity constant you can find in the line Magnetic similarity.
Copy there G and DG and paste them in the
line Newtonian constant of gravitation. Bottom values will change immediately.
The upper 11 results in the table were taken from the article
Some other pages about Hubble constant:
Here are links to some abstracts about Hubble constant:
To index of Space Genetics,
This page was last updated: the 17 of November, 2008, by
Ivan Gorelik (my resume, coordinates and email)