Note from May, 2018
Since 2008 I have been an active fighter against the dangerous experiments, which were planned to perform at the Large Hadron Collider. In this regard, I was even given the title "Big Hadron Frick". The authors of Freakopedia had stolen some phrases from my web-site and published that at their pages. But my ideas were so hostile to modern religious scholars that "my information" in Freakopedia was destroyed by them. I was banned (forbidden) almost everywhere.
Now I understand that all this fuss around the Large Hadron Collider, most likely, was a big lie. This is similar to the six expeditions of the American Rambo-astronauts to the Moon, committed between 1969 and 1972. The whole world had swallowed this lie. The Soviet Union was shifted from the first place in the space exploration to the second step. Following this shift, our Union had lost its force in all other spheres. The goal was achieved. And more! Now our students continue to receive "the noodles onto their ears" about the space achievements of American Rambo astronauts.
So, were the Americans on the moon?
Most likely, they are there. Or rather their corpses. And who was there before? Our cosmonauts, or American?
It’s hard to tell. And it is unlikely that any country will admit that it sent suicide-volunteers to the Moon. This is unethical! But we need the knowledge. So, it is quite possible, that now, somewhere on the Moon surface there are several corpses. And thankfully to them we have some samples of lunar soil in our museums. In order to deliver those samples from the Moon surface, volunteers ought to take one-way tickets to the Moon, perform the task and die. The task of the suicide-volunteers was to pack a small rocket with lunar soil, shoot this missile to the near-Moon module, and die silently from exhaustion and radiation.
And what about the Large Hadron Noodles?
Citizens, I think you were saved! You were saved by Walter Wagner, Luis Sancho, Otto Rösler, Vasily Golota and others who spoke about the global danger of experiments at the LHC.
Those physicists, who are at the top of the chicken coop at last realized that experiments at the Large Hadron Collider could lead to the destruction of the planet. But instead of acknowledging their mistakes, they imitated and continue to imitate collisions at the collider. Collisions are “carried out” on the computer screen, and the entrance to the collider tunnel is strictly prohibited!
To confirm their Large Hadron Noodle, they even "discovered" the Higgs boson and gave the Nobel Prize.
So, dear student, do not think that you are a fool one, and you are the only person one who does not understand how this Higgs boson gives the mass to all other particles. I also do not accept this idea. It's just famously twisted spaghetti on our ears. In fact, everything in physics is much more interesting and reliable!
See, how the electron moves in our space-time! An electron does not just revolve around the nuclei. Your electrons are leaving your body billions of billions of times per second. Can you imagine? All your particles fly around the entire universe in a small fraction of a second many, many times. And they constantly flare up, materialize in your bodies. This conclusion is the consequence of quantum mechanics with its non-zero probability to detect your electron far beyond your body. The new look at Special Relativity also leads to this conclusion. Look here, please:
Note from 2016.
The explosion of the Earth is an unavoidable act of reproduction of life in the Universe.
Yes, dear reader. Exactly! The Earth is probably already doomed. Despite of our protests, the most "outstanding" physics of the world had already made the physical experiments, which start the collaptical explosion of the Earth. It is a slow process. It will last from 10 to 1000 years. The term depends of how much collapsars were created, and how quickly these microscopic collapsars would grow. It is very sad. But nothing can be done - it is necessary to live and enjoy the remaining years. We must pride in the fact that we, or our children, grandchildren will be the generation, who will bear the seeds of life in other star systems. All, of course, will die, but our DNA will be stored in cold comets. The simplest organisms can also experience metamorphosis. The eggs, pupae, larvae, worms will evolve into some sort of comet's creatures in the centers of the largest comets - giant foam spray the Earth's oceans.
It is a natural consequence. This is the law of the Space Genetics. Planetary civilization, which reached child-bearing age must blow up our planet, to give new life to the eternal Universe. In order to do that, the civilization should have genetically inherent desire to take risks, to develop a scientific dogma called the Big Bang. It is paradoxical, but the explosion of the Earth has been initiated with the purpose to check the truth of this vomit Big Bang. They did not prove anything. A dogma remained the dogma, but the Earth has already doomed to be torn into peaces. And what about the universe? Nothing! She is always eternally young! And the life is eternal in the Universe. There is no other way of reproduction of biospheres, except of explosive panspermia. The need for suicidal explosion has been developed in the Universe. This is the major gene in the living Universe.
14.11.2015. These days the global terrorists are going to a new world record. :(
22.02.2015. In a few days the Big Hadron Earth's Murder will restore its operation. Criminals from CERN want to see our common END as soon as possible... But we still live and I want to present you my new invention: The Separator. It is needed in order to divide the air into oxygen and nitrogen... In order to use the first in engines... The Separator can also be used in order to divide chemical elements onto isotopes, for example onto K39, K40, K41. They are needed in pressnuclear reactor, invented by me several years ago.
Read more at my Russian-language pages...
November 7, 2010. The first collisions of heavy ions with energy 3.5 Z TeV were performed the 6-th of November. Was the collaptical explosion of the Earth switched on or not, we’ll be able to know, observing the intensity of neutrino flux from the Earth. If the growth of the flux will not be registered till this New Year, then all is OK and you can live calmly. I would be happy to be an "Ivan-Durak" , or "Ivan-the-Fool", but let’s wait till New Year.
Magnetic Holes and Golden Section.
Will they create microscopic magnetic holes, and will we all fly into cosmos, we will know in a nearest days. The first harbinger of a growing global catastrophe is the growing flux of neutrino from the microscopic dangerous condensates (magnetic holes, strangelets, mixtures of strange nucleons with neutrons and/or other possible hyper nucleons).
These days I had investigated the properties of magnetic holes, was looking for extreme. I found them and was deeply surprised because they were numerically equal to the famous Golden Section.
Do mathematicians know about such equations? Or magnetic holes give
as new equations?
The solution of these equations is a number Y=0,6180339887498948482
Let’s return to magnetic holes and see at some new results.
These harmonic oscillations can be visible from K inertial reference system, connected with the center of the particle, as a periodic movement along the x-axis from -rcl to +rcl and vice versa. In a space-time scan the world line of this oscillating pointlike shell will look as a sinusoid directed in the future.
If we look at these oscillations from the successive systems of references K1, K2, K3.., were the pointlike shell is in the state of rest, we’ll receive two pseudo circumferences, - right/left and top/bottom.
Top/bottom circumference has two extreme. These extreme are situated at points x = +/-Y rcl, where Y Golden Section, rcl classical radius of a particle.
This motion looks as if particles weave the space at right and left sides; untwist it in the bottom of the figure, i.e. in the past; and bind the semi-spaces together, being itself as a singularity in the space-time.
In my deduction I used two modified Rindler’s wedges. My modified Rindler’s wedges
move along the time axes synchronically to time flow.
Those, who do not believe me about the Event Horizon in the Rindler’s wedge, can read a correspondent article in the Wikipedia.
The presence of Event Horizon says us about a "hole" or a "singularity" in a space-time. Now received "hole" is not the "gravitational black hole", but a "chromomagnetic hole" or a hole, made by nuclear forces. This hole continues to be a chromomagnetic hole till the rotation it the (x, ict) plane exists. But if the particle is forced to turn in space-time by some external forces from (x, ict) to (y, z), it can eject a lepton and become a pure "magnetic hole", or to become a constituent part of some bigger magnetic hole, rotating in a space-space plane, for example in (y, z) plane. This constituent element of magnetic hole is a pair of a charge and anticharge. It looks like a medicine pill in a tin of magnetic hole.
On the following figures you can see the space-time scans.
For the "push" case:
Extrema correspond to the x values, where the green lines are gorisontal.
In the "pull" case: red quasi-hyperbolae begin in the bottom and finish at the
top; green quasi-hyperbolae begin in the left side and finish at the right side.
In the bottom wedge lines are crossed. That means that there is no field there. Literary speaking, the charge draws the lines in the future regions and spends paint; the charge gathers the old paint from the past region by crossing its old lines.
Chromomagnetic field of nucleon:
After a turn from (x, ict) rotations to (y, z) rotations and after the lost of lepton, the nucleon transforms from microscopic chromomagnetic hole into magnetic hole (boson):
which is a constituent part of a bigger magnetic hole (ferromagnetic vacuum of Savidy):
As a result a Solar system can be transformed into something like this:
Some new links:
September 16, 2010. Transition into the second generation floor of the Universe.
On the bottom figure you can see a schematic transition of our matter, made of
electrons, up and down quarks, living in the space, sewed by photons and electron
neutrino, into a parallel floor of our Universe, that is into the second generation
matter, made of muons, strange and charm quarks, living in the space, sewed by inverse
photons and muon neutrino. At the figure you can not see a z spatial axis, but one
can imagine it, if he can imagine four-dimensional figures.
So, the transition of ordinary up/down matter into a 2-generation strange/charm matter is more symmetrical that the transition of ordinary matter into strange matter.
But both transitions lead to one result, - destruction of Earth.
The figure reminds us a gravitational black hole and wormhole. But it is not a usual black hole. That is a quantum multy-thread portal to another floor of Universe. The funnel (threads) is (are) not infinite as in the case of usual black hole. As a result a Schwarzschild radius of this portal can be mach greater, and it can be achievable at p-p or HI-HI collisions at LHC.The first heavy ion collisions are planned at the 9-th of November this year.Dear people, do you want to be sucked into that portal.
September 11, 2010.
uuu uud udd ddd
These are triads, which can be made of up, down and strange quarks. One of these triads is stable in isolated state; it is a proton, uud. All other triads are more massive than proton (uud), as a result, they all decay. It is known, that the triad udd, which is neutron, decays, if it is isolated. The cause of decay is clear; - the mass of free neutron is bigger than the mass of free proton.
But the situation is different inside another environment:
The question arises, - is there a subnuclear condensate, where some quark triads be more stable as usual proton-neutron condensate, which are the nuclei of our Earth?
Till now physicists had received unstable nuclei, consisting from three types of triads: protons (uud), neutrons (udd), and lambda-hyperons (uds).
Here are some examples of such hyper-isotopes:
They are shown on next figure which was taken from the article
Till now physicists had received even an anti-hyper-hydrogen, which is also unstable.
But look at the beginning of this text, and try to understand, when unstable free neutron becomes more stable than proton, if neutron is not already free, but bonded in subnuclear condensate.
Try to answer, what will happen with the ordinary matter, if physicists will create a stable condensate of lambda-hyperons, or of a mixture of neutrons and lambda-hyperons.
These subnuclear condensates have no limit of grows. Usual subnuclear condensate, consisting of protons and neutrons, do, have the limit, which is uranium. Uranium finishes the periodic table of stable elements. The existence or absence of the limit is explained by the electrical charge of a condensate. Usual nuclei have an electrical charge. Condensates, made of lambda-hyperons and/or neutrons, do not have the electrical charge. As a result, they do not have Columbian barrier, which do not let the ordinary nuclei to fuse.
The 9-th of November 2010 CERN plans to collide heavy ions. As a result, the Solar system can be exploded into a nova star. If strangelets will capture ordinary nucleons, ruin them and grow without decay on smaller strangelets, then the duration of explosion will be about of 500-1000 days. If growing strangelets at some moment would decay at smaller strangelets, then the duration of Earth explosion can be much less.
There are some other microscopic condensates, which can be created at LHC, for example, microscopic magnetic holes. Result of such experimental discovery will be the same - the Earth's explosion.
Heavy ion collision is a new dangerous step, planned by CERN physicists. They will be started in two months. Politicians, businessmen, ordinary people believe that "the best physicist" on the planet are correct. CERN propaganda had made its criminal role; - courts, switched on by opponents of dangerous CERN's experiments, are failed.
So, people, be ready to be murdered. You did not believe us earlier, you do not believe us now. You a lazy to ruin the CERN, you are lazy to strike in order to save yourself. You are a crowd of silent cattle, which must be killed. I wish you happy flight in icy comets to other star systems. Go and bring there a seeds of new life. Do not fear to die, and fulfill your sacred mission. Fasten your safety belts; - be ready to suicidal reproduction of biospheres.
September 7, 2010.
From my point of view, the most dangerous things, which can be made on proton-proton
(p-p) collisions at powerful colliders, are two different condensates: microscopic
magnetic holes and microscopic droplets of strange matter. In the bottom
I'll name both of them by unifying term "droplets".
September 3, 2010. TeV energy collisions can lead to formation of a droplet of dangerous fermionic or bosonic condensate (strangelet or magnetic hole, correspondingly). That will lead to collaptical explosion of our Earth and Sun. Astronomers can see about 15 such explosions in our Galaxy every year.
There is very great probability that we all are already doomed, if the dangerous droplets were already created and grow somewhere inside the Earth. We'll be able to know about growing droplets existence, when their masses will be about of 1 kg or couple of orders more. At such mass their neutrino output will be comparable to the output of one nuclear power station. On the next day - ten times more; the next day - hundred times more...
So, fasten your safety belts, - be ready to start into cosmos; be ready
to suicidal reproduction of our biosphere.
Do not fear.
Don't fear to die and perform your sacred mission.
Yesterday I have made a program
"Explosion of the Earth,
switched by criminal physicists"
April 2, 2010. Look
at the patterns at the page
These patterns are beautiful. And magnetic wasps are better than the whole Earth explosion. But the date of this article is the 2-nd of April, the next day after the day of Fool.
Here is a comment of Dr strange Feynman from the discussion
RE LHC and atom smashers, in the 7 reasons section and earthquakes:
There are concerns that millions of collisions/sec will produce strangelets of form USD (up-strage-down) or multiple of those in equal number forming a condensate of 3 types, neural charge (aether), pos charge, and a neg charge. The neg charge stranglet get stable (with the lowest A number for stable condensate and most reactive+dangerous form) when there are 200-500 S quarks in the condensate (like bose-einstein condensates but with dark matter s quark). Now if this is stable, CERN likely knows that it is. So, the only safe thing is to contain it an a magnetic jar (which is what the ring is) via its charge. Supposedly, by feeding this condensate neutrons, you can create energy and the mass of the condensate continues to grow. This is a dangerous kind of energy source since it can consume all baryons of our world if it got loose. Supposedly, they harvested this strange condensate at the 1 TeV collider.
I notice you fail to mention this. Also, micro-black holes are supposed to dissipate when in a high energy quark-gluon plasma. However, the claim is that with a vortex can cool the mixture and allow stable formation. The large number of reactions in a small space could allow combining of microBHs.
Hawking also says, that microBH will radiate energy making them an energy source. However, current satellites cannot see emissions from blackhole (not being fed of course) thereby reducing their mass. He claims particles jump back in time reducing the BH mass and other wild stuff not verified.
My concern is we don't understand enough about concentrated collisions producing large numbers of S C T B quarks and specifically formations of fermi condensates. This is mostly and issue in 2013 when collider reaches 14TeV as planned. Anything over 10Tev should make the Charm, Top and Bot quarks appear.
I suspect they are not just trying to prove the SM AND higgs boson but rather are looking for dangerous energy sources of unlimited capacity but if the break their magnetic bottle, we all die. Why else would they invest so much in it? Perhaps they know the probability of having 200-500 S quarks is too unlikely given the total energy input and the usd decay rate. However, we have models that we assume are correct that we are trying to verify - ie a circle unproven. Scary to me."
March 30, 2010. Crime had happened. Collisions with the energy 3.5 TeV per proton or 7 TeV per collision were performed.
If a dangerous microscopic condensates (magnetic holes, strangelets or black holes) were already created then, according to the time of its growth, which is equal from 1000 seconds to 1000 days, we can suppose that the most probable days of "our start into cosmos" are from 30-th of March to the 1-st of April.
Here is my crude estimation of probable outcomes:
March 19, 2010. Today night the criminals from CERN accelerated protons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam. At the regions of collisions, probably, the rays were on skew lines (two lines that do not intersect but are not parallel). It is not excluded that there were accidental collisions of protons.
If the collapse was switched, then most probably tomorrow morning all people will start to cosmos.
According to plan the first collisions at 3.5 TeV must be fulfilled the 30-th of March.
March 10, 2010. By
the way, it seems, unstable condensates were already been created at Tevetron.
That follows from the multimuon events (up to 8 per droplet and antidroplet)
described at the end of 2008 by CDF collaboration.
Here is a figure from
c) Abnormal events. I would change the signs '?' by N(usd) and N(usd).
The next figure is taken from
The 8(usd) corresponds to the
point Z=0, N=0, S=8;
More than 10(usd) is stable!
I'm scared, but can not do anything, - all ways lead to catastrophe.
March 5, 2010. The Earth will be blown up in one of the next days, by the scum who call themselves as scientists. Society you are a stupid cattle - because, despite the existence of this and similar web-sites, you did nothing for the detention of terrorists, physicists from CERN and other scoundrels, sitting in academies and promoting this blasphemous experiment. Cattle, I do not feel sorry for you. I do not believe any more that this experiment can be banned. Burn, all of you in this bright last flame.
I reread the LSAG report once more and found there another error. The binding energy of constituent element of strangelet is not several MeV, as they wrote there, but about 500 MeV. So, all their talks about thermal bath are erroneous. Strange matter is very dangerous!
The value 500 TeV, as a binding
energy of (uds) in a strangelet N(uds), can easily be received from comparison
with the rest energy of kaons K+ and K0, which are
correspondingly 493 MeV and 497 MeV.
This explosion has specific energy output, which is hundred times bigger than under the nuclear explosion.
By the way, at the time of November-December
collisions there were more Kaons output that it was theoretically predicted.
That means that we are very close to creation of this dead droplet, which
can transform the whole Earth into 10-meterr lump of strange\dead matter.
Read about strange matter, strangelets, and strange stars in Wikipedia. I think that our civilization is crazy. From one hand, it already knows about a deadly dangerous strange matter; from the other hand, it tries to create that dead droplet at colliders. I do not understand you, people.
I wish you to become mentally healthy and STOP all powerful colliders.
Somebody wrote: Also the mass of a proton is 938.272 MeV/c^2 and the mass of a uds is 1,115.683 MeV/c^2.
Mass of a free proton is 938.272
These mass differences say us about binding energy.
Strange droplet consisting of a several (uds) is unstable and decay.
AFAIK some authors said that droplet
could be stable if it has at least 10 elements.
Note. My computation for magnetic hole gives: energy of ruined protons splits per two parts: 2/3 goes into creation of magnetic field; 1/3 goes into binding energy or simply emitted with radiation.
Strange matter has fermionic structure.
CERN physicist can create dead droplet, having fermionic, bosonic or scirmionic structure. Any such condensate is dangerous, because it can transform the whole Earth into dead extremely dense matter.
Now they collide protons with energies of about 0.45 TeV per proton. In any of the next days the energy can be risen to 3.5 TeV. That can create a microscopic droplet of death, and in a 1000 seconds our Earth will be exploded.
PS: In the Galaxy at the time of about 100 000 000 000 years almost all stars dies and the same number of stars are born. Now is the time for our Sun. Who will push the button?
February 19, 2010.
February 18, 2010. My commentary to the article
Microscopic black hole is a Droplet From Chromomagnetic Condensate.
February 15, 2010. Copy
February 13, 2010. Here (arXiv:0711.2845v1 [hep-lat] 19 Nov 2007) we can read about gluon condensate, or so called color ferromagnetic vacuum state, firstly proposed by Savvidy about thirty years ago.
Here is also ferromagnetic exited vacuum.
I think that such magnetized regions can be created at proton-proton collisions. Do you see the lattice?
Here is also 'Lattice QCD in strong magnetic fields' http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0909/0909.1808v2.pdf
Here (arXiv:0710.1084v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2008) you can read that such magnetic domains are stable. And I will add: "They can grow if there is an ordinary matter in vicinity".
Here (arXiv:hep-ph/0508219v1 20 Aug 2005) you can find that some neutron stars (magnetars) do not consist from neutrons (baryons), but are color ferromagnetic, - di-quark condensate, where magnetic dipoles are formed from monopoles.
In all these articles you can find approximately the same value of critical magnetic field (1016 T, or 1020 G).
The microscopic embryo of such abnormal magnetized matter will be created soon at LHC and our Solar system will go to the stars cemetery.
My computed value of critical magnetic field approximately coincides with results in all these and others articles. It can be achieved somewhere about 1-TeV collisions.
At RHIC there were already received progenitors of a dangerous matter, so called fireballs. In some articles one can find the observed value of magnetic field in the RHIC collisions (1015T), which is slightly less than my computed value of critical field, when anti ferromagnetic vacuum transforms into a stable ferromagnetic state.
Wait a couple of weeks. It is possible we will survive. I give 50% on our survival. Dear people, if you do not want to be killed, - stop CERN, bring criminal physicists, risking by your life, to criminal responsibility.
February 11, 2010. My comment to article Higgs hunters face long haul http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/41631
Again to deadly error with cosmic rays.
Let's see at Analogy and at Example.
Let�s suppose that exactly the same magnetic hole was created at a collision of a cosmic proton with atmospheric proton. This �cosmic magnetic hole� will have exactly the same velocity as a collider proton. Consequently, in a reference system of this cosmic hole, all atmospheric protons will have kinetic energies about 1 TeV. This energy is bigger than the binding energy of a hole (2/3 TeV). Consequently, the cosmic hole will be ruined almost immediately after the first collision of a hole with atmospheric particle. A shower of secondary particle will be formed and it can be registered as �a cosmic rays shower�.
The 20-th of February CERN begins the �work� with 3.5 TeV energies per particle. I give 50% that the Earth will be exploded in the nearest weeks. This probability is grounded on two independent math proves, giving almost the same result, and on a dozen of additional arguments. Several scientific articles, which give some conclusions analogues to mine, except catastrophic predictions, were found.
PS. Some results of December collisions were published recently. http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/lhc-results-0205.html It was found that the quantities of ejected mesons were unpredictably high. I think that these high transverse mesons currents prove the theory of magnetic hole. Any of next collider collision can create a stable exited magnetized region of vacuum, which was named �magnetic hole�. Magnetic hole can ruin the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
Read also the article "Law and the end of the world" http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/41564
February 9, 2010. From my correspondence at Russian-language
Equation of magnetic hole will be achieved at LHC pB=mc^2.
Look here (Russian-language article) http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1878/article_28613.pdf
Why here we can see 348 MeV (0.348GeV), but I said that dangerous collisions are collisions with energy 0.25 TeV (250 GeV) per proton, or 510 GeV per collision.
According to my conclusions the minimal dangerous magnetic hole must contain 510 bosons, which can be created at 510 GeV collision. One thirds, or 170 GeV, goes out in the form of radiation, and corresponds to the total binding energy of all bosons inside the hole, or about 1/3 of GeV per every boson.
The mass of every boson inside hole is about 2/3 GeV in energy units.
The number from article, 0.348 GeV corresponds to one quark with the charge 1/3 q. Proton is three-quark (three-polar) structure and for proton we will have the number, which is 3 times bigger, i.e. about 1 GeV.
In a critical magnetic field (1016 T) proton decays at boson and positron. Boson is captured by hole, where his mass is about 2/3 GeV. The rest, 1/3 GeV, goes into kinetic energy of positron and at gamma photon(s).
Why we did not create a magnetic hole till now?
It is possible, but in order to see such picture, you must throw up these 100 coins approximately 2100 times (or 1,27�1030).
No one collider had made this number of collisions.
But the probability can be risen up greatly, if we would raise the energy of collisions.
Or, as they wrote in article: �If magnetic field is defined from qB ~ 1.5 GeV^2, then longitudinal component of a current is much stronger, comparatively to the transverse component, whereas at comparatively weak fields qB ~ 0.3 GeV^2 the enforcement is not observed.� I say that here there is a boundary value of magnetic field for transition of vacuum from antiferromagnetic state into ferromagnetic state.
Conclusion: There are already several little sprouts of magnetic holes theory, but the theory delays drastically comparatively to the experiment. The 20-th February CERN begins work with 3.5 TeV energies per proton. I give 50% that the Earth will be exploded in the nearest weeks.
In January issue of "Chemistry and Life" an article "Black Hole in Collider", written by Sergey Komarov, was published. There he had also mentioned a theory of magnetic hole, which is discussed here.
January 25, 2010. This portrait is dedicated to CERN decision to start collider work the 20-th of February with energies 3.5 TeV per proton.
January 23, 2010. Remade from my correspondence on a forum about ugly delusional shit of murders, - "Hawking radiation".
In order to do that I need a couple of endorsers, who will give his signatures for my adequacy. Big Bang murders will not let me to publish an article in any of scientific journals. The whole scientific press now in the dirty clutches of monsters from Fascist Fundamental Science, who call themselves scientists.
Another lie. Where is Phaeton?
Safety reports contains three crude errors and one lie assertion.
You did see the �Hawking radiation� in the form of solar light.
Magnetic holes are �black holes in Kaluza-Klein space-time with extra dimensions, uniting gravity and electroMAGNETISM�. Magnetic holes are 1036 times stronger than gravity holes.
Let�s speak about �Hawking radiation�.
Bell paradox. If two rockets, connected by a string, are accelerated with equal acceleration, then the string would be torn. Or accelerations of rockets must be different.
Unruh and Hawking used this property and come to similar
The second part of Hawking formula describes the temperature
of a black hole of mass M.
This accelerating particle has a mass m and its Compton
wavelength λc or radius
Rc, which are connected by equation:
Using this formula, we can change the Unruh/Hawking formulae:
T = maRc / 2pk;
These formulae give Unruh/Hawking temperatures at the depth R, which is equal equal to Compton radius of a particle Rc. On the bottom figure we expanded the validity of these formulae for any depth R. Besides we transformed the formulae from exact form to approximate form, because the substance can consist from particles with different masses and because the substances can be at different states (gas, solid, liquid, the mixture of molecular and photonic parts...).
Left side. Unruh. A rod, accelerating relatively vacuum with acceleration a. Unruh temperature is in the depth R, which is equal to Compton radius of a particle, Rparticle.
Right side. Hawking. Earth crust with a rod in it, accelerating relatively vacuum with acceleration g; that is the same as if the vacuum accelerates relatively you into opposite direction! Hawking temperature is in point R=Rparticle. If a or g are constant, then T ≈ maR/k or T ≈ mgR/k.
If acceleration depends from the depth R, then we must rewrite this formula in differential form:
dT/dR ≈ mg / k.
Increment of depth dR can be substituted by increment of radius dr with opposite sign.
dT/dr ≈ -mg / k.
This is a formula of gravitational temperature gradient. This gradient does not lead to heat exchange between layers. This idea is very old. AFAIK, the first person, who discussed it, was famous physicist Loschmidt. But it was forgotten not only because the formula dT/dr = 0 is simpler, but also because the formula dT/dr ≈ -mg / k ruins the notions, which were supported by religious clerics: "thermal death of Universe", "cemetery of extinct stars", "Big Bang Dogma".
From the other hand, if you substitute the values into the formula dT/dr ≈ -mg / k, you will receive the experimental value of temperature gradient in Earth, which is about 10-30 Kelvin per kilometer. That is an experimental facts, but Big Bang murders rather explode the Earth and kill all of us, than recognize the experimental facts.
The formula dT/dr ≈ -mg/k is valid for any state of substance with the precision to numerical coefficient about 1. This formula is valid for planets and stars. This formula is valid for usual acceleration a, for gravitational acceleration g=GM/R2, for centrifugal acceleration a=v2/r. It explains old puzzles, such as Ranke effect, but it is not accepted by physicists, because it ruins also the most fundamental fascist religion, the Big Bang Dogma.
So, development of Unruh/Hawking formula shows us that there is no any �black hole evaporation� but there are Eternal sources of energy in the Ever Young Universe.
This figure explains why the temperature of gas in the left chamber is greater then in the right chamber.
In fact that was only a small part of a story.
About 1998 I had received a formula of
stellar energy sources. According to my formula
the energy output of a star is proportional to M4/R5.
Couple of years ago I understand that my formula is analogues to Hawking
formula, which lead to analogues proportionality: M4/R6.
You can see that proportionality are not the same. The cause: Hawking formula
connected with the surface temperature; my formula is connected with the
distribution of matter along the radius of a star.
That is another, hundredth prove of Eternal Universe, but its very pity, - in order to prove Big Bang Dogma, fascists from CERN will explode the Earth in 20-40 days with great probability. Dear reader, I wish you happy flight to other star systems of Ever Young Universe.
January 11, 2010. What pilots will save the world, Russian or
January 8, 2010. This is not my picture. Perhaps its author is my good friend, supporter.
Citizens! Do not think that some good Uncle Ivan would come and destroy the CERN and its doomsday machine, LHC. Think yourself for your salvation. And not just think, but act. I have no flight experience, no money for the fighter and for a nuclear warhead to bomb the LHC. If you will not stop the CERN now, the CERN will kill all of you in the first quarter of this year, with the probability of about 50%.I am a physicist. I always respected physicists. Now I hate most of them. They are rogues, cowards, killers, psychic freaks. Damn you, you bastards, academicians, and candidates with the doctors, except for units, my supporters, active supporters of the ban of the experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.
January 2, 2010. From the correspondence on the forum
No! Collision is a vague term. All protons from one bunch constantly interact with all protons of another bunch by exchange with virtual photons and by some other virtual particles. Most of such collisions are elastic and lead only to change of direction of a particle.
Proton-proton collision, which leads to creation of stable excitation of physical vacuum, can look like this inelastic collision.
Directions of both protons were changed. Moments and kinetic energies
of both protons were diminished. Formula of collision can look like one
of these formulae:
Created magnetic hole captures protons; destroy them onto positron and x-boson (or onto μ+ and x-boson, or onto p+ and x-boson); ejects positron (or μ+, or p+) and captures x-boson and grow. Note: x-boson does not consist from two up-quarks, but is rather a leptoquark in Kalusa-Klein space.
December 31, 2009.
Yes. In the ordinary vacuum different virtual particles constantly appear and disappear. In the bottom figure we can see the appearance of electro-positron pair in the point A and their annihilation in the point B.
In order to transform virtual pair into real pair we must spent energy. On the next figure we can see the x-boson, consisting from two fermions, particle and antiparticle.
If the energy of p-p collision at collider is sufficient we can create an exited region in vacuum containing some quantity of such x-bosons. They are oriented in the same direction and have the superconductive and ferromagnetic properties.
If proton enters into the field of such exited vacuum it can be ruined onto x-boson and positron. X-boson will be captured by magnetic hole and the hole will become bigger per one x-boson. Positron will fly away and annihilate there with some electron. The rate of matter destruction will be growing. The Earth will undergo the collaptical explosion in a period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.
December 29, 2009.From the correspondence on the forum
Somebody1 wrote: Don't you think it would be pointless for them to earn money they would never get a chance to use? Do you suppose all the scientists in the world have suicidal tendencies?1. There are patent documents (I read several times about that, but don�t remember the sources now) how to catch holes and use them as energy sources. If those patent documents were written by CERN workers, then the administration of CERN have the ruling rights on that inventions.
2. Here is a quote from the book �Physics of elementary particles�, written in 1982 by well known Russian physicist L.B. Okun, translated by me. �The discovery of proton decay would be a Discovery of the Age� Among grand-monopoles there must be colorless, purely electromagnetic, and those having magnetic and chromo-magnetic charges. Now (1982) ideas, proposed by Rubakov, are widely discussed with great interest. According to him the processes like p + monopole -> e+ + monopole + meson and/or pair of leptons would have cross sections, comparable to cross sections of usual hadron inelastic processes. In this induced proton decay the monopole plays the role of catalyst, - it survives and can destroy unlimited number of protons. If the cross section of induced decay would be great, then in the detector, which is intended on search for proton decay, the monopole would made a chain of proton decays (practically coinciding in time). That would be a picturesque phenomenon. There are already ideas to use the catalyses of proton decay switched by stopped monopoles in order to create the energy. According to optimists, this would save the humankind from the energy sources crisis forever.�
Let�s return to discussed formula, p + monopole -> e+ + monopole + meson and/or pair of leptons, and rewrite it thus:
M + p -> M + e+ + meson + (and/or pair of leptons).
In another article we can find the formula without meson.
M + p -> M + e+.
Is it correct?
I think that M is not the magnetic monopole, but magnetic dipole. Meson is massive x-boson, which does not leave the magnetic dipole, but becomes its constituent part.
Consequently the corrected formula looks thus:
Mn + p -> Mn+1 + e+, where Mn+1 = Mn+1 + x-boson.
This x-boson is an elementary excitation of physical vacuum, virtual pair, transformed into electromagnetically polarized real pair.
The energy output of this energy source will grow exponentionally and in one thousand seconds/days the shell of Earth would be thrown into cosmos.
About suicidal tendencies. Most of CERN physicists do not know about Migdal�s pion condensation; about magnetic catalyses of proton decay. Some of them know that, but they think that those mesons would decay (p0 -> couple of photons). They are wrong.
Magnetic hole is analogues to nuclear quasi hole (nucleus). They both have their correspondent binding energy. Cosmo-atmospheric magnetic hole is bombarded by TeV atmospheric particles and decays, creating the show of secondary particles. Collider magnetic hole moves slowly, ruins protons and grow, capturing x-bosons.
Analogy: nucleus, bombarded by TeV-neutrons, will be ruined; average nucleus, bombarded by eV-neutrons, will grow.
Here some quotes from some articles. My commentaries are in brackets.
arXiv:0711.2845v1 [hep-lat] 19 Nov 2007
Spontaneous creation of chromomagnetic field and A0-condensate at high temperature on a lattice. V.Demchik, V.SkalozubAbstract. ...It is discovered that the field configuration consisting of the magnetized vacuum and the A0-condensate is stable. (It is discovered that magnetic holes or nuclear x-boson condensate are stable).
Nowadays it is generally accepted that the non-linearity of non-Abelian gauge fields could result in formation of field condensates. The first model of gluon condensate, so called �color ferromagnetic vacuum state�, was proposed thirty years ago by Savvidy... (Yes, x-boson condensate has the property of ferromagnetic).
It describes the spontaneous generation of the uniform Abelian chromomagnetic field H = const due to a vacuum polarization. (Yes, x-bosons in the hole are oriented in the same direction. B~1016 T).We have determined that for the temperatures 1/β = 100 − 500GeV , the field strengths H = 1022 − 1024G,.. (Yes, B~1016 T, or ~ 1020 G. Dangerous energy is 250GeV, or 0.25TeV, per particle).
Other important result of the present work is that the spontaneously magnetized state is stable. This indicates that a true vacuum at high temperature is formed from these condensates. (Yes, at high energy particle collisions our false vacuum can be ruined and the Earth can be exploded).
arXiv:0710.1084v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2008
Axial anomaly and magnetism of nuclear and quark matter. D. T. Son, M. A. Stephanov.
We consider the response of the QCD ground state at finite baryon density to a strong magnetic field B. We point out the dominant role played by the coupling of neutral Goldstone bosons, such as p0, to the magnetic field via the axial triangle anomaly. We show that, in vacuum, above a value of B ~ mp2 / e, a metastable object appears�the p0 domain wall. Because of the axial anomaly, the wall carries a baryon number surface density proportional to B. As a result, for B >~ 1019 G a stack of parallel p0 domain walls is energetically more favorable than nuclear matter at the same density. (Yes, B~1016 T or 1020 G. p0 domain walls are made of x-bosons. But its density is 100 times greater than nuclear density.)
...a Goldstone field is spontaneously generated, is ferromagnetic due to the axial anomaly. We estimate the size of the fields created by such a state in a typical neutron star to be of order 1014 − 1015 G. (Yes, ferromagnetic and having the axial symmetry. The center of neutron star can be a magnetic hole with B~1016T or 1020 G).
The typical strength of a magnetic field which would change the structure of the QCD vacuum is very high and can be estimated as B ~ mρ2/e ~ 1020 G, (1) where mρ = 770 MeV is the typical energy scale of QCD. (Yes, mass of x-boson is about 2/3 of mass of proton, i.e. 670 MeV. Minimal magnetic hole, able to ruin protons and capture another x-boson, must have at least 510 x-bosons. Its total mass is about 340 mass of proton (0.34TeV) and it can be created at proton-proton collisions with energy abut 0.25 TeV per proton. If magnetic moment of x-boson is different then the computed values are also different.)
December 16, 2009. At night they collide protons with energies 1.18 TeV per proton; day - 0.45 TeV. At 18.00 collider was stopped for about a month. Did they already make magnetic holes? If yes, then the Earth will explode in some of next days/months. If not, then CERN will add the energy of particles and quantity of bunches per beam.
December 10, 2009. About a midnight from 8 to 9 of December at the Collider they risen up temporarily the energy of collisions to 1.18 TeV per proton. In the early morning December 9 in the sky of Norway people could see such picturesque image
Then I saw this figure I remembered at once the idea about
magnetic wasps. I wrote about them in some Russian-language forums earlier:
Magnetic wasps have not only magnetic poles, but also electric poles. In this case the capture of protons by wasps is asymmetric. This gives them jet engines. This explains huge velocities of remnants on cosmic catastrophes�
But later I learned that the figure did not connected with Collider, but it is the result of unsuccessful launch of Russian rocket Bulava.
My yesterdays (look bottom) sad assumption remains valid, but shifted almost a day. Collider operates intermittently: the problems with the injection, then with cryo systems.
December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density. Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out within a few hours, then I give 10% probability that the microscopic magnetic holes will be created. The most likely, the time of growth of magnetic holes till the consumption of the whole Earth is about one day.This means that tomorrow night the magnetic field of growing magnetic hole will push us all to the equator of the Earth in a single high ocean wave. From there we will start into space, being mixed with mud and with all the water of the whole planet.
This frog levitates (hanging in the air) in a magnetic field with induction of 16 teslas, because of the diamagnetism of water, and, as you know, living beings are composed mainly of water.
The magnetic field will accelerate us so that we will overtake Voyagers. Around us the water will turn into frozen dirty foam of very low density. The solar wind will give these new formed comets a further acceleration. An hour later the comets will be hit by wreckage of the crust of exploded Earth and by a powerful gamma radiation. After a few years (thousands of years) we will be overtaken by the shock wave from exploded Sun. Well, after a millions of years, we could reach to the closest star systems to sow where our viruses, DNA and the seeds of poplars, daisies, etc.
December, 7. 07.30 GMT.
Now I go to Moscow State University to talk with physicists.
By the way, while I fighting in Moscow, two cars with seven policemen come to my home in Feodosia couple of days ago. They asked my neighbors: am I adequate; can I beat anyone; can I beat my wife?
This arrival possibly connected with my letters to some presidents of European countries, which I sent a week ago:
Collisions of protons with energies about 1 TeV can lead to MAGNETIC collapse and explosion of Earth with probability about 30%. Thus, you can kill me and my relatives.
Please, advice me, what can I do to stop you:
1) To kill some citizens from your countries?
Ivan Gorelik. firstname.lastname@example.org
Calm down, gentlemen. I am not able to kill anybody. I wrote this in order to make you think: what are you doing.
December, 6, 2009. 06.30 GMT.
CERN started collisions of protons with energy 0.45 TeV per proton. Both beams have four bunches of protons.
If magnetic moment of x-boson equal to magnetic moment of proton this energy is sufficient to create the microscopic magnetic hole.
It is needed from 1000 seconds to 1000 days to destroy the Earth. Let�s wait and see.
If we�ll survive now, CERN will add the quantity of bunches per beam and will raise the energy of collisions.
CERN started the experiment despite the courts and our appeals. CERN is terrorist organization.
Most of physicists are coward, or stupid, or smug, not able to understand where this experiment will lead us.
December, 5, 2009.
At the end of the article the author try to calm the readers that LHC will collide protons with the energy only about 450 GeV.
But the calculation (two independent approaches) gives us the value about 250 GeV.
Indeed, that is smaller than the collision energy of Tevatron. But is it possible to create a magnetic hole at Tevatron, colliding protons and antiprotons? Magnetic field in the central point between these flying by particles is equal to zero, B = 0. But at the LHC B = 2B1.
That is smaller than the energy of cosmic rays. But look at my model with two 10-kg bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.
The 250 GeV energy per colliding proton was already achieved at RHIC. Experimentalists could see collapses � fireballs � about four years ago. It is possible that those fireballs are experimental proves of magnetic holes. Those holes evaporated immediately because the RHIC collided heavy nuclei, containing many protons and neutrons. Will such holes evaporate at LHC, or will created magnetic holes begin to capture the slowly moving protons of Earth?
One of the authors of documents about the safety of LHC, Igor Tkachev,
is 100% confident that at the center of our Galaxy there is a huge black
Astronomers, show me, please, black holes.
Magnetic holes explain us the cause of several astronomical pulses: gamma-bursts, huge radio jets, the annihilation lines of electron-positron pairs, huge velocities of remnants of cosmic catastrophes, the absence of civilizations which are older, than those, who can build powerful colliders.
People, please, stop powerful colliders immediately.
Send police to CERN and arrest Rolf Heuer and all his bigbangers. He
is deadly dangerous for all humanity. He can kill you today with great probability.
November, 30. CERN had risen up the energies of beams to
Collisions of protons with energies about 1 TeV can lead
to MAGNETIC collapse and explosion of Earth with probability about 30%.
Thus, you can kill me and my relatives.
November 28, we widespread a Leaflet of protest.
November 27 at 12.00 I and my son tried to held the meeting of protest near the Moscow State University. At 12.30 we were taken into police office, where we continued to protest for about 4 hours. At last militia had made our photos from different positions, took our finger-prints, returned our megaphone-siren and wished us a success in our straggle.
First collisions were performed, November 23.
STOP CERN! A call to reasonable people all over the world.
In a several days the first high energy collisions of protons
will be implemented by CERN at Large Hadron Collider. This can lead to the
explosion of our planet and to extermination of our humankind.
Tomorrow we�ll begin to read lectures �What is Magnetic
Trap and how
Dogs of CERN�s Boss threatened to put me into jail.
Yesterday (several days ago) some man, possibly from Rolf Heuer environment, had phoned me and asked � did I threaten to Heuer. The conversation was ended by the threat to put me into jail and by saying that our phone conversation was recorded.
Dear CERN leaders, I feel myself as a prisoner, sentenced to be killed. Those are you, who already deadly scared many citizens of the whole Earth. They, probably, feel themselves as doomed to death. We do not know exactly the day when you will shoot us, and we do not know will we survive.
Our feelings of fear are different. These feelings depend from the probability, which some person gives to catastrophic scenario. Year ago, September 2008, I thought that the probability of the global catastrophe, caused by LHC, is hidden somewhere in the region 10^-6-10^-5. That was not so scary; - this risk probability is analogues to die in an air plane catastrophe. This probability did give me the possibility to sleep quite calmly. But in the period of the last year I had developed the theory of magnetic hole. My probability value of global catastrophe had grown almost each week, because I received dozens of proving arguments and two independent mathematical proves. I studied CERN�s documents about safety of LHC and found there three crude errors and lie assertions. Now I know that probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is not 10^-31, as it follows from CERN documents, but it is hidden somewhere in the region 5-90%. Do you understand this value? Can I sleep calmly now? Who are you now in my eyes, potential killer?
So, Rolf Heuer, go on, send your dogs here, into my town.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for
the Large Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45
TeV will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies
of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop
it. It will end with ejection of the Earth�s shell into outer space.
According to Russian online �opinion poll� at November 17, 2009, 51% of respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!
1. CERN, LHC. Big Bang of Earth is appointed at late October, 2009. (According to last news - November, 2009)
2. Oganesyan from Dubna appointed the Earth's explosion at July, 2009.
Academician Oganesyan in Dubna will try to create the transuranium element with the charge number 117 in July of this year. The creation of transuranium elements is one more method (by pion condensation) to create the magnetic trap. Here is a link in Russian: http://www.nkj.ru/news/15673.
3. According to preliminary plan:
the 30-th of November
- collisions with energies 0.45 TeV per proton;
According to my computations of energies, needed to create
magnetic hole, the probability of Earth's explosion is:
Some documents and links.
1. In November 2008, I arrived to Moscow in order to file a lawsuit against the Russian Academy of Sciences and against the most active propagandists of the LHC launch. Unfortunately, for lack of funds, I still (February 2009) can not to do it.
2. In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?" at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow. But later, I received a "retreat" from this institution.
3. In December, I sent the Letter to the President of Russia. In January, I received an answer in which it was stated that my letter was forwarded to the Russian Academy of Sciences.
4. In December, I sent the Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation. Soon after, I received the answer stating that my letter "was sent for review in the prescribed manner".
5. In the end of January I returned to Feodosia (Ukraine) and continued
to inform about the risks of the global catastrophe. You can read some letters,
which were send to the Google groups, - just click my Google-
Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are you, dear reader: "a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?
Magnetic trap of Devil. What is Big Bang and who is bigbangers? Two independent methods give exactly the same results. Magnetic trap is possible at 0,25TeV proton-proton collisions. The third independent approach, "Characteristics of magnetic holes", gives analogues results.
Arguments, proving that "The LHC will lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist"; "We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe". Religious and mystic arguments.
Links in Russian
One of my last posts to forums:
No. Not monopole, but dipole. I used the word �monopole� in some my texts
on the following causes:
To index of Space Genetics