Crude Errors in Risk Assessment of Colliders.
From my correspondence at forums.
What will happen if pB will be equal to mc2, where
p Ė magnetic
moment of a proton; B Ė magnetic field, created by another flying by proton
(or the field of already made magnetic hole)
mc2 Ė the rest energy of proton?
Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of Stephen Hawking.
In the CERN's article ďThe safety of the LHCĒ
Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible happens."
This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic forces
of protons. That is way, I named nucleus by ďnuclear quasi-holesĒ.
Physicists, did you see the difference?
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region
of exited superconducting vacuum. This regionís diameter is about 10 meters.
The thickness is about 2.5 meters. The strength of magnetic field in this
region is about 1016 teslas. Because of the strong magnetic interaction,
this small magnetic hole will move on spiral trajectory to the Sun. As a
result, the Sun will explode and astronomy amateurs from neighbor stellar
systems (alien free thinkers) will observe novae or supernovae phenomenon.
Alien stephen hawkings will say: ďThe world will not come to an end when
the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater
energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing
The second crude error is made by the authors of
"magnetic monopoles can catalyse proton decay. Can this be a problem?
The authorís logic would be correct only in the case of isotropic medium. But the Earth has itís own gravity field and itís own magnetic field. Both these fields are not isotropic. Created monopoles will not go far from the attracting places. They will randomly move around these places till destroy all protons of the Earth. So the correct number is not 1018 but 1051, divided by the number of created monopoles.
Let's make a computer model. In order to see the point of particle's exit we'll make two-dimensional model. Three-dimensional model gives analogues result. Let the length of free path of dangerous particle will be 102 times smaller the radius of the Earth model. Then, in the absence of gravity field, according to theory it must collide and ruin (102)2 = 10000 particles. Testing the program four times, we can receive the following figures.
Let's begin to switch on the gravity by steps in conventional units:
0.01; 0.02; 0.04; 0.08.
The correspondent numbers of ruined protons are 55 603; 101 161; 189 545; 10 000 000. In the last case the dangerous particle did not leave the model, but the program was stitched out at the number 10 000 000.
At the further growth of gravity field to the values 0.2; 0.4 we can see that the particle makes the same 10 000 000 collisions, but paints the smaller regions near the center of the model.
Consequently, the strongly interacting dangerous particle will not leave the Earth until it will ruin almost the whole Earth's matter. Of course, the time, needed to utter destruction of Earth is extremely huge, but if we take into account the next error of CERN's physicists, this time would be diminished to about 1000 seconds.
III. The third error is hidden in the formula of monopole catalyses of proton decay
M + p = M + e+.
More correct formula must contain the number n:
Mn + p = Mn+1 + e+.
This number shows the number of x-bosons in magnetic monopole (one more type of magnetic holes). These bosons have the equal quantum numbers. Magnetic hole works as laser. The word laser originated as an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Laser creates the same photons, which are bosons with zero mass energy. Because of zero mass, photons fly away from laser with the speed of light. Magnetic trap creates x-bosons, which have non-zero rest mass. These bosons do not fly away but becomes the constituent part of magnetic hole. The bigger the number n Ė the bigger the rate of magnetic collapse of ordinary matter into magnetic hole.
IV. The fourth error is hidden in poor imagination of authors, who had
investigated the possible dangerous particles, which can be created at colliders.
Here I do not stop on mBHs, strangelets, vacuum bubbles. Iíll stop only
on magnetic traps.
People, I am in shock from your silence!
Humans, like a herd of obedient sheep, are lead to the abyss. I, as a mortally frightened lamb, run from side to side of the herd, but the herd do not hear me. They laugh at me and moves slowly, plucking the juicy grass.
People, please, wake up! Open your eyes!
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large Hadron Collider, the collision of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV will be implemented, 14 December - collision with energies of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earthís shell into space.
I give the probability of about
Why is such confidence, - you would ask.
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole:
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc2
is reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders.
Humans, are you really obedient sheep, ready to be killed?
In late November 2008 at the "meeting of four"
there was decided to hear my report
The failed report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?"
In September 2008 I came to the conclusion that the experiment at LHC, is indeed a serious threat. I have come to this conclusion after attempts to create a model of particles that can absorb the ordinary matter, surrounding us. I use the Steady State model of the Universe, which is different from the traditional model, the theory of Big Bang. It turns out to be that in the Steady State model, the probability of global catastrophe is higher than it follows from the Big Bang theory. This is due to the fact that space-time at the micro level is different in these models. My model is based on the strictly ordered space-time lattice, and particles are the defects and the sets of defects, which are the internal elements of this lattice. In the Big Bang model the space-time at micro-level is a vacuum foam, and the substance particles, colliding with high energies, are independent, torn out from space-time. It is a quark-gluon plasma, living independently in the space-time. In the Steady State model , we have a lot of constant values: the Hubble constant, the temperature of the background radiation, the relationships between the average specific energy of the physical vacuum, the baryonic matter, and the leptons. In the Big Bang model these values can change with time.
29.11.2008. Ivan Gorelik Yu, email@example.com
Models of particles, capable of absorbing the usual matter.
Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop / liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ...
Neutron drop is the object which looks as a drop. It is formed from neutrons with the same orientation of spins, and with a density similar to the nuclear density. Pauli exclusion principle does not work because the neutrons do not have the same spatial coordinates, and the drop may be in such rotation that neutrons have different orbital moments.
Neutron hole is the object which looks as an infinitely thin coil with many circular loops. Each loop creates a magnetic field which is equivalent to magnetic field of one neutron. Pauli exclusion principle does not work because the neutrons are grouped in Cooper pairs.
Magnetic hole is the object like a neutron hole, but the difference is that the neutron capture is accompanied by the release of neutrino, and the proton capture is accompanied by the release of a positron. Pauli exclusion principle does not work because magnetic hole is made of bosons.
The most plausible calculations were made for the neutron hole. The most realistic object is a magnetic hole. It is clear that numerical estimates for these objects will be different, but the difference is small, with numerical factor which is close to unity. Further we shell use the term magnetic hole, with a numerical evaluation of the neutron hole.
Approximate calculation of the minimal possible mass of the neutron hole.
(For a more precise calculation, look the page, written couple months later.)Let's suppose that the neutron hole is similar to the superconducting coil of n turns, where n is the number of neutrons in it. Binding energy is calculated successively: for two, three, ..., n neutrons within the neutron hole.
The binding energy of n-th neutron with the neutron hole is equal to the energy, that can be spent in order to turn one-loop coil at 90o relatively the the coil, containing (n-1) loops.n=2; E2=pB;
where: p is the dipole magnetic moment of one-loop coil (neutron); B - magnetic induction, created by one-loop coil.
The total binding
energy, Etotal will be equal to the sum of all right parts
of upper equations.
Specific energy can be received dividing Etotal by
the number of neutrons.
The magnetic moment of the same circle is p=IS=IpR2.
The binding energy of the 2-loop coil:E2=pB=m0pI2R/2. Given that we are aware of the magnetic moment of neutrons (p=0,966e-26 ńś/“Ž), the last formula can be transformed to
E2=m0q3c3/(16pp), where we used the obvious formulae p=IS; I=q/t=qc/(2pR), S=pR2.
Let's define n, at which the neutron binding energy is equal to the
rest mass of the neutron.
This corresponds roughly to one TeV.
Some other values can also be easily received.
About the Risk Assessment of LHC-experient.
Let's read an excerpt from an article "The safety of the
Reading the article further, we can notice that the group "LHC Safety
Assessment Group" has poor imagination. They investigated the possibility
of creation only for four objects: microscopic black holes, strangelets,
magnetic monopoles, the vacuum bubbles. And almost every item was dismissed
by the comparison with cosmic rays.
Therefore, the neutron hole, formed at the collider, is expected to grow. The neutron hole, formed by the collision of cosmic particles with the atmosphere particle, will evaporate immediately after next set of successive collisions, forming a heavy shower of secondary particles. These showers are observable.
What do we see in the sky: black holes or magnetic traps?
Observational objects, which are associated with black holes, in many
cases contain accretion disks, and along the axis - the radio emissions.
These emissions can be understood so that the magnetic trap captures only
"edible" matter, but emits streams of charged particles: electrons, positrons,
and possibly, proton and antiproton.
Thus, we can conclude that pulsars, magnetars etc. are magnetic traps.
Many observable objects, which were called the black holes, are not in
reality the black holes, because of one very important reason. Classical
black holes should not have a magnetic field. But the majority of the candidates
on black holes have enormous/huge magnetic fields. Sometimes these objects
are now called ęMagnetospheric eternally collapsing objectsĽ (MECO)
There are several unresolved issues in astrophysics: the existence of radio emissions, gamma-ray bursts, strange behavior of accretion disks, the origin of cosmic rays of high energies; the process of collapse of a supernova. These problems can be solved much easier if we assume, that some observation objects contain magnetic traps at their centers.
A.B. Migdal. "The Search for Trooth."
P. 56. Such instability may occur in a sufficiently strong electric
field. As was shown by calculation, the pion condensation occurs near the
nucleus with the Z number of protons, with Z more than 1500.
Let's repeat the phrase "... there must be a neutron stars of all
Approximate scenario of the catastrophe.
Microscopic magnetic traps can be created in one of the colliders, because
physicists working there, can not be stopped. Microscopic magnetic traps
will rush to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path.
With time, they will merge together into a single powerful and rapidly growing
magnetic trap. The thin shell of the Earth with all of us, will be ejected
into outer space, but the bulk of the Earth will turn into a current circuit
of 6 meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same
mass is equal to 9 millimeters.
Further, the magnetic trap and will rush to the Sun and drop at its surface, but does not sink, because the magnet is pushed out of diamagnetic plasma. Then they will form a close rotating stellar pair, and the 6-meters magnetic trap will rapidly absorb the matter of the Sun. When the radius of the magnetic trap will be equal to 158 meters, its mass will be equal to 1/20 of the solar masses. This will be the culminating moment, when two radiuses "collides", - the radius and Schwarzschild and the radius of the magnetic trap. Part of the substance inside of the magnetic trap will become inside the black hole, and as a result, the explosion happens. Part of the Sun will be ejected, and it will look from afar, like a nova. If the remnants of magnetic trap has not been subjected to kick out, it will again absorb the substance of Sun, and again in twenty years, after reaching the critical mass, 1/20 of the mass of the Sun. Repeated explosions may continue until the Sun is almost finished. Through the hundreds or thousands of years in its place will twinkle a neutron star, surrounded by the torus, filled by the remnants of the Sun.
Magnetic traps are probably observable. The system of rings is visible in the remnants of supernova SN 1987A. See, how these rings are changing over time, - please click . These rings lie on the hyperboloid. Imagine it, so that the rings were belting this hyperboloid. And now look at the electron , moving on the hyperboles in the coordinates x, ict. SN 1987A and the electron look alike.
The muon hole was created at the Tevatron.
According the recent publications [6-10] a new particle was discovered
at the Tevatron collider.
1. The safety of the LHC.
To index of Space Genetics