Due to Emergency the contents of this page is shifted bottom.

Then I saw this figure I remembered at once the idea about magnetic wasps. I wrote about them in some Russian-language forums earlier:
http://physics-animations.com/cgi-bin/forum.pl?forum=new&mes=64416&resp=15
There is a small hope that plasma bubbles will leave the Earth and will be rejected into cosmos. Such objects can be named by “magnetic wasps”. I give very small probability of such behavior of magnetic holes, less than one percent, inside catastrophic fraction, which is measured by dozens of percents. Thus, magnetic wasps could lead only to local catastrophe…

Magnetic wasps have not only magnetic poles, but also electric poles. In this case the capture of protons by wasps is asymmetric. This gives them jet engines. This explains huge velocities of remnants on cosmic catastrophes”

But later I learned that the figure did not connected with Collider, but it is the result of unsuccessful launch of Russian rocket Bulava.

My yesterdays (look bottom) sad assumption remains valid, but shifted almost a day. Collider operates intermittently: the problems with the injection, then with cryo systems.

December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density. Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out within a few hours, then I give 10% probability that the microscopic magnetic holes will be created. The most likely, the time of growth of magnetic holes till the consumption of the whole Earth is about one day.This means that tomorrow night the magnetic field of growing magnetic hole will push us all to the equator of the Earth in a single high ocean wave. From there we will start into space, being mixed with mud and with all the water of the whole planet.

This frog levitates (hanging in the air) in a magnetic field with induction of 16 teslas, because of the diamagnetism of water, and, as you know, living beings are composed mainly of water.

The magnetic field will accelerate us so that we will overtake Voyagers. Around us the water will turn into frozen dirty foam of very low density. The solar wind will give these new formed comets a further acceleration. An hour later the comets will be hit by wreckage of the crust of exploded Earth and by a powerful gamma radiation. After a few years (thousands of years) we will be overtaken by the shock wave from exploded Sun. Well, after a millions of years, we could reach to the closest star systems to sow where our viruses, DNA and the seeds of poplars, daisies, etc.

December, 7. 07.30 GMT.
Now they have cryo problems.
Possible causes from my point of view:
1) Microscopic magnetic holes are already created and emit the radiation.
2) Usual breakage.

Now I go to Moscow State University to talk with physicists.

By the way, while I fighting in Moscow, two cars with seven policemen come to my home in Feodosia couple of days ago. They asked my neighbors: am I adequate; can I beat anyone; can I beat my wife?

This arrival possibly connected with my letters to some presidents of European countries, which I sent a week ago:

Collisions of protons with energies about 1 TeV can lead to MAGNETIC collapse and explosion of Earth with probability about 30%. Thus, you can kill me and my relatives.

Please, advice me, what can I do to stop you:

1) To kill some citizens from your countries?
2) To kill myself in front of your Embassy?
3) ???

Ivan Gorelik. darkenergy@yandex.ru
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
+7 (8)965 372 00 36

Calm down, gentlemen. I am not able to kill anybody. I wrote this in order to make you think: what are you doing.

December, 6, 2009. 06.30 GMT.

CERN started collisions of protons with energy 0.45 TeV per proton. Both beams have four bunches of protons.

If magnetic moment of x-boson equal to magnetic moment of proton this energy is sufficient to create the microscopic magnetic hole.

It is needed from 1000 seconds to 1000 days to destroy the Earth. Let’s wait and see.

If we’ll survive now, CERN will add the quantity of bunches per beam and will raise the energy of collisions.

CERN started the experiment despite the courts and our appeals. CERN is terrorist organization.

Most of physicists are coward, or stupid, or smug, not able to understand where this experiment will lead us.

December, 5, 2009.
At last, the news about the most dangerous thing, which can be created at LHC, was published in well-known media edition. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/04/dr_dark_energy/

At the end of the article the author try to calm the readers that LHC will collide protons with the energy only about 450 GeV.

But the calculation (two independent approaches) gives us the value about 250 GeV.

Indeed, that is smaller than the collision energy of Tevatron. But is it possible to create a magnetic hole at Tevatron, colliding protons and antiprotons? Magnetic field in the central point between these flying by particles is equal to zero, B = 0. But at the LHC B = 2B₁.

That is smaller than the energy of cosmic rays. But look at my model with two 10-kg bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.

The 250 GeV energy per colliding proton was already achieved at RHIC. Experimentalists could see collapses – fireballs – about four years ago. It is possible that those fireballs are experimental proves of magnetic holes. Those holes evaporated immediately because the RHIC collided heavy nuclei, containing many protons and neutrons. Will such holes evaporate at LHC, or will created magnetic holes begin to capture the slowly moving protons of Earth?

One of the authors of documents about the safety of LHC, Igor Tkachev, is 100% confident that at the center of our Galaxy there is a huge black hole.
I am 95 % confident that at the center of our Galaxy there is a huge magnetic hole. I think that magnetic hole, besides the magnetic field, has axial-symmetric gravity field, stretching mostly in the plane of our Galaxy. This explains the huge velocities of peripheral stars of our Galaxy. In other words, - there is no any dark matter in our Universe. Its role is performed by magnetic holes. There is no any dark energy in our Ever Young Universe. Its role is performed by cosmic background radiation. Hubble constant is not the parameter of Universe expansion, but the angular frequency of 4-d rotation of Universe. 13.34 billion years is not the age of Universe, but the time of one full 4-d rotation of Ever Young Universe. Energy sources of stars in Ever Young Universe are different from the sources in Big Bang Universe. Our energy sources can be described by corrected formula of Hawking. This formula must contain the square root from Dirac’s big number. This formula describes the luminosity of stars, but not the black holes evaporation. In our model there are no black holes, but there can be extremely rapid gravity collapses, ending by disappearance of gravity funnel and huge gamma-burst. Gravity collapse is the final part of magnetic collapse if the mass of the magnetic hole is sufficient and if its configuration is correspondent.

Astronomers, show me, please, black holes.
No?
But, I can to show you the picturesque magnetic hole.
Here it is:

Magnetic holes explain us the cause of several astronomical pulses: gamma-bursts, huge radio jets, the annihilation lines of electron-positron pairs, huge velocities of remnants of cosmic catastrophes, the absence of civilizations which are older, than those, who can build powerful colliders.

People, please, stop powerful colliders immediately.
Collisions with energy, more than 100 GeV must be banned by international law, otherwise our Solar system will look like SN 1987A.

Somebody asks: Is it possible you are wrong with your theories. Is it possible?

If I was not confident, I would not fear LHC, I would sleep calmly, but, as can you see, I am in shock now.

Somebody asks: How have you determined, with such certainty, that your right?
You still have provided no proof at all that you are correct.

Two mathematical proves. Dozen of supplementary arguments.

Somebody asks: Is it possible that you are overly fearful and that scaring the public is a irresponsible, immoral and unethical thing to do if you have no proof at all of your theories?

I said the truth. Are bigbangers responsible and honest in their gaining the ruling position in science? Look at the open letter of anti bigbangers, signed by thousand of famous scientists, who are rejected the idea of Big Bang: http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
There is no pluralism in science now. Science was transformed into religious dogma by bigbangers. Because of this I have no job in science. Because of this the Earth can undergo the big bang, but this bang will not prove the Big Bang theory.

People, please, stop powerful colliders immediately.
Collisions with energy, more than 100 GeV must be banned by international law.

Send police to CERN and arrest Rolf Heuer and all his bigbangers. He is deadly dangerous for all humanity. He can kill you today with great probability.

December 2, 2009 I have delivered petition to the Prosecutor’s Office of Russia.


To Prosecutor’s Office of Russia.
From Ivan Gorelik (address, phone, passport data)
Statement


1. Please bring to criminal responsibility the authors of documents on the Large Hadron Collider Safety Assessment, because these documents contain crude errors and false statements. See Annex 1.
2. Please contact the law enforcement bodies of the European Union and demand the immediate termination of the experiment at the Collider, since the experiment could lead to the magnetic collapse and to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
Grounds:
A. 20 November 2009 an international committee ConCERNed filed a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights in Geneva to stop the experiment at the Collider, but CERN continues experiment and increase the energy of collisions and their frequency. http://www.lhc-concern.info/
B. Physicists of CERN considered only four items of dangerous objects that can be created at the collider, and ignored the theory of magnetic holes. I have repeatedly appealed to higher authorities about the danger of magnetic holes. Calculation of magnetic holes is shown here: http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
3. I beg to bring to the United Nations the issue of an international ban on the collision of particles with energies higher than 0.1 TeV.

December 2, 2009. Signature.
Annex on three sheets from my page Russian language page Crude Errors and Lie in the Safety Assessment of Collider. http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezru.html English language analog of this page you can find here: http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html

November, 30. CERN had risen up the energies of beams to 1.18 TeV.
I wrote a following letter to some leaders of CERN:

Collisions of protons with energies about 1 TeV can lead to MAGNETIC collapse and explosion of Earth with probability about 30%. Thus, you can kill me and my relatives.

Please, advice me, what can I do to stop you:

1) To kill some citizens from your countries?
2) To kill myself in front of your Embassy?
3) ???

Ivan Gorelik. darkenergy@yandex.ru
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
+7 (8)965 372 ????

November 28, we  widespread a Leaflet of protest.

November 27 at 12.00 I and my son tried to held the meeting of protest near the Moscow State University. At 12.30 we were taken into police office, where we continued to protest for about 4 hours. At last militia had made our photos from different positions, took our finger-prints, returned our megaphone-siren and wished us a success in our straggle.

First collisions were performed, November 23.
Now CERN is ready to rise up the energy of collisions.
------------------------------------
Today, November 24, I'll try to organize a meeting of protest against CERN.
Moscow, Zubovskij bulvar, 4. Near the Russian Informational Agency "Novosti".

STOP CERN! A call to reasonable people all over the world.

In a several days the first high energy collisions of protons will be implemented by CERN at Large Hadron Collider. This can lead to the explosion of our planet and to extermination of our humankind.
We, citizens of Russia, Byelorussia and Ukraine, are planning to fulfill several actions. We call you to make the same in your countries.
1. The 20-th of November 2009 we’ll start to distribute the Leaflet in order to say people about the real deadly danger of the LHC experiment.
2. The 23-rd of November we’ll try to block the entrances to the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow State University and so on. No one person can enter these buildings until authorities of these organizations would say at media about their rejection and ban of the experiment.
3. The 29-th of November, that is a day before the first planned collisions, we’ll perform another action. The essence of this action we’ll be expounded additionally.
This plan will be canceled any day, if CERN leaders we’ll refuse the LHC experiment.
We were forced to go to these extreme measures. Previously, we have repeatedly made more loyal measures: appealed to the superior authorities, but CERN continues to go ahead and can kill us very soon. We can not sit silently for our execution.
November 16, 2009.
1. Ivan Gorelik, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html
2. Vasiliy Golota, http://n-t.ru/tp/ng/ps.htm
3. Vladimir Acjucovskij, http://www.atsuk.dart.ru  
4. Evgeniy Dovgel, http://dovgel.com/kvv.htm
5. Valentina Golovina.
6. Julia Polognjuk.
7. Sergey Vertinskij.
8. Tatiana Pravdina.
9. Vyacheslav Satane.
10. Nikolay Ermolajev.

Tomorrow we’ll begin to read lectures “What is Magnetic Trap and how
it can kill the Earth”.
The lectures will be held in front of Embassies of Switzerland and
France, and in front of Russian Academy of Sciences and Moscow State
University.

2009, November 22.
RCRBU.

Dogs of CERN’s Boss threatened to put me into jail.

Yesterday (several days ago) some man, possibly from Rolf Heuer environment, had phoned me and asked – did I threaten to Heuer. The conversation was ended by the threat to put me into jail and by saying that our phone conversation was recorded.

Dear CERN leaders, I feel myself as a prisoner, sentenced to be killed. Those are you, who already deadly scared many citizens of the whole Earth. They, probably, feel themselves as doomed to death. We do not know exactly the day when you will shoot us, and we do not know will we survive.

Our feelings of fear are different. These feelings depend from the probability, which some person gives to catastrophic scenario. Year ago, September 2008, I thought that the probability of the global catastrophe, caused by LHC, is hidden somewhere in the region 10^-6-10^-5. That was not so scary; - this risk probability is analogues to die in an air plane catastrophe. This probability did give me the possibility to sleep quite calmly. But in the period of the last year I had developed the theory of magnetic hole. My probability value of global catastrophe had grown almost each week, because I received dozens of proving arguments and two independent mathematical proves. I studied CERN’s documents about safety of LHC and found there three crude errors and lie assertions. Now I know that probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is not 10^-31, as it follows from CERN documents, but it is hidden somewhere in the region 5-90%. Do you understand this value? Can I sleep calmly now? Who are you now in my eyes, potential killer?

So, Rolf Heuer, go on, send your dogs here, into my town.
My anger grows every day with the nearing of the day of proton collisions at LHC.
I do not know what I’ll do in the end of November.
I hate you, your CERN, your countries authorities.
(...)

Application.

November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer space.

I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not happen;
C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
30% I leave to my mistake.

Why is such confidence?

Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole:
GMm / r = mc^2 / 2;
pB = mc^2.

It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is reachable at the energies of modern colliders, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html  
It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html  

The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If the second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But then it would not save you already, because magnetic holes would already grow inside the Earth.

Here is explanation of the most visible crude error, made in 2003 safety article.

1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = 1 m.
Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m.
How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the object?

Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.

2. How many Earth’s protons will be ruined by dangerous particle, if R/r = 10^9?

A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18.
B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, the trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight line, but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a result the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where: N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created dangerous particles.

Another crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation, is in equating of the consequences of protons collisions at LHC with collisions of cosmic particles with atmospheric ones.

To see the drastic difference between such consequences, let’s make two thought experiments.
There are two 10 kg bottles with neutrons.
Additional requirements, used in the model: 1. free neutrons do not decay; 2. proton do not capture neutron; 3. any nuclei, heavier than proton, can capture free neutron; 4. neutrons do not interact with the matter of bottle; 5. the density of neutrons in the bottle is the same as of water.

A. Let somebody put one slowly moving nucleus into the bottle. Neutrons will begin to be captured by the growing and dividing nuclei. In a couple of moments this laboratory will be exploded a town will look like Hiroshima after the nuclear attack.
B. If somebody will bombard the same bottle by nuclei, having the kinetic energy about several TeV, he will see that nuclei are ruined in collisions and formed a cloud of protons and neutrons.

A. Approximate way of reactions can look like this dividing chain:
He3+n -> He4;
He4+n -> He5;
He5+n -> He6 -> Li6+e;
Li6+n -> Li7;
Li7+n -> Li8 -> Be8+e;
Be8+n -> Be9;
Be9+n -> Be10;
...
U235+n -> X+Y+2n
X+n ->...; Y+n ->...
two branches;
...
four branches;
...
eight branches;
...
Collaptical explosion!

B. Nuclei with TeV kinetic energy will be ruined by high energy collisions with neutrons in the backward order in crude approximation.

Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic forces of protons. That is way, I named nuclei by “nuclear quasi-holes”.
Magnetic collapse has no limit. Magnetic hole will grow till there is the food, - the matter of planet or star.

The biggest error of CERN physicists is in the equating the consequences of A and B.
A. Collisions of protons at LHC;
B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.

Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make microscopic magnetic holes.

Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter are drastically great.
A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities, such as slow nucleus entered into the neutron-bottle, and exploded the town.
B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have relativistic velocities, such as TeV nuclei, destructed in the neutron-bottle.

Result:
A. LHC’s holes will capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth.
B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes will be ruined almost immediately. Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. Physicists observe such showers.

In our upper model with two neutron-bottles we could see that bombardment of bottle by eV-nuclei can lead to Hiroshima-like explosion, but TeV-nuclei bombardment are safe. Correspondingly LHC-collisions can destroy the Earth; cosmic-atmospheric particle collisions occur constantly and safe.

Most of physicists are confident that heavy particles, created at LHC will decay.
That is a deadly error.

LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than the mass of proton.

To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.

Imagine what will happen, if biologists would make a creature with the mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a thin film and pushed deep into the ground.

Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same size.
What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting protons?
Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the drop.

Particle physicists think that proton consists from three point-like quarks (u, u, d). In fact, proton can be composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro-magneto-weak poles (u, u, d). In a strong magnetic field this three-pole construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.

There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed energy would also be different.

We know two types of explosions: chemical and nuclear. Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical. At nuclear explosion only a few thousand’s parts of explosive rest energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of fragments. At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of the star is released in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of the rejected stellar shell. What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole?
Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider?
My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.

LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions are waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer space?

The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. The strength of magnetic field in this region is about 10^16 teslas. Because of the strong magnetic interaction, this small magnetic hole will move on spiral trajectory to the Sun. As a result, the Sun will explode and astronomy amateurs from neighbor stellar systems (alien free thinkers) will observe novae or supernovae phenomenon. Alien stephen hawkings will say: “The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible happens”

The next crude error of CERN physicists is hidden in the formula of magnetic* catalyses of proton decay

M + p = M + e+.

More correct formula must contain the number n:

M{n} + p = M{n+1} + e^+.

This number shows the number of x-bosons in magnetic hole. These bosons have the equal quantum numbers. Magnetic hole works as laser. The word “laser” originated as an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Laser creates the same photons, which are bosons with zero mass energy. Because of zero mass, photons fly away from laser with the speed of light. Magnetic trap creates x-bosons, which have non-zero rest mass. These bosons do not fly away but becomes the constituent part of magnetic hole. The bigger is the number n – the bigger is the rate of magnetic collapse of ordinary matter into magnetic hole.

* Physicist usually say: “monopole catalyses of proton decay”, I say that magnetic hole is magnetic dipole and M in my upper formulas denotes magnetic dipole.

According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 17, 2009, 51% of respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!

Fine Structure Constant Collection

Here is my letter Golden Section and Alpha numbers send to the newsgroup sci.physics 01.16.2001.

Hi!

Several days ago I tried to find the fine structure constant, which is ~ 1/137.036, but suddenly received the value of Golden Section, exactly. Does anybody know the relation between these numbers, as much as precise? If the relation would be simple and the precision is great, then we could find the precise value of fine structure constant.

Here is the way of my erroneous search of Alpha.
Alpha is the velocity of an electron in the hydrogen atom; let's denote it "a".
Velocity of light is 1.
When light made one revolve around the nucleus, the electron will cover only "a" fraction of circumference.
But modern physics must be a little modified. :)
Accordingly to Space Genetics particles do not exist constantly, but periodically flash in a set of dots, drawing so the trajectory of a particle.
Consequently, we don't know; is the electron rotated clockwise or vise versa?
Consequently, it can cover the "a" fraction of circumference or the "1-a" fraction of circumference.
If we take into account the SR!!!, we'll receive the equation:
2a^3 - 3a^2 - a + 1=0
which gives no Alpha, but generally known Golden Section number:
(sqr(5) +/- 1) / 2.
It is quite strange that in order to receive it I took into account the SR.
-------------------

Paul Lutus wrote:
...
>The fine-structure constant is empirical, Phi is not (it is exactly
>(sqrt(5)-1)/2 ). There might be a relation, but it is very doubtful.

Me: I hope it exists.

> * Actually, and not surprising given its degree,
>2a^3 - 3a^2 - a + 1 = 0 has three solutions:
...
> a = 1/2
> a = (1+sqrt(5))/2 (-0.618034...)
> a = (1-sqrt(5))/2 (1.618034...)

Me: I would take:

• a_1 = c/2, as clockwise.
• a_2 = -0.618034...*c, as visa versa.
• And I would though out a_3 = 1.618034...*c, as speculative tachion result.

Thank you and regards.

Some links, containing information about the fine structure constant
and other links on the topic:

Helge Kragh. The fine-structure constant before quantum mechanics. Eur. J. Phys. 24 (2003) 169–173. Online at stacks.iop.org/EJP/24/169, abstract, pdf. Excellent historical review of fine structure constant and large list of numerology results.

M. J. Duff, L. B. Okun and G. Veneziano. Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants.

N.V. Makhaldiani and Z.K. Silagadze. Do Maxicharged particles exist?

D. PALLE. On high-redshift quasar absorption spectra and the Riemannian geometry of the Universe.

Jacob D. Bekenstein. Fine-structure constant variability: surprises for laboratory atomic spectroscopy and cosmological evolution of quasar spectra.

E. E. Krieckhaus. DIMENSIONS OF a: A GLITCH IN ATOMIC CONSTANTS.

To the page Alpha method.

To index of Space Genetics.