Normalized Units

NORMALIZED UNITS


Due to Emergency the contents of this page is shifted bottom.


December 10, 2009. About a midnight from 8 to 9 of December at the Collider they risen up temporarily the energy of collisions to 1.18 TeV per proton. In the early morning December 9 in the sky of Norway people could see such picturesque image.

Then I saw this figure I remembered at once the idea about magnetic wasps. I wrote about them in some Russian-language forums earlier:
http://physics-animations.com/cgi-bin/forum.pl?forum=new&mes=64416&resp=15
There is a small hope that plasma bubbles will leave the Earth and will be rejected into cosmos. Such objects can be named by “magnetic wasps”. I give very small probability of such behavior of magnetic holes, less than one percent, inside catastrophic fraction, which is measured by dozens of percents. Thus, magnetic wasps could lead only to local catastrophe…

Magnetic wasps have not only magnetic poles, but also electric poles. In this case the capture of protons by wasps is asymmetric. This gives them jet engines. This explains huge velocities of remnants on cosmic catastrophes”

But later I learned that the figure did not connected with Collider, but it is the result of unsuccessful launch of Russian rocket Bulava.

My yesterdays (look bottom) sad assumption remains valid, but shifted almost a day. Collider operates intermittently: the problems with the injection, then with cryo systems.


December 9, 2009. Today, about midnight, CERN plans to implement a collision with the energy of 0.45 TeV per proton under high density. Two colliding beams will contain four bunch; each of which will contain 20 billion protons. If this experiment will be carried out within a few hours, then I give 10% probability that the microscopic magnetic holes will be created. The most likely, the time of growth of magnetic holes till the consumption of the whole Earth is about one day.This means that tomorrow night the magnetic field of growing magnetic hole will push us all to the equator of the Earth in a single high ocean wave. From there we will start into space, being mixed with mud and with all the water of the whole planet.

This frog levitates (hanging in the air) in a magnetic field with induction of 16 teslas, because of the diamagnetism of water, and, as you know, living beings are composed mainly of water.

The magnetic field will accelerate us so that we will overtake Voyagers. Around us the water will turn into frozen dirty foam of very low density. The solar wind will give these new formed comets a further acceleration. An hour later the comets will be hit by wreckage of the crust of exploded Earth and by a powerful gamma radiation. After a few years (thousands of years) we will be overtaken by the shock wave from exploded Sun. Well, after a millions of years, we could reach to the closest star systems to sow where our viruses, DNA and the seeds of poplars, daisies, etc.


December, 7. 07.30 GMT.
Now they have cryo problems.
Possible causes from my point of view:
1) Microscopic magnetic holes are already created and emit the radiation.
2) Usual breakage.

Now I go to Moscow State University to talk with physicists.

By the way, while I fighting in Moscow, two cars with seven policemen come to my home in Feodosia couple of days ago. They asked my neighbors: am I adequate; can I beat anyone; can I beat my wife?

This arrival possibly connected with my letters to some presidents of European countries, which I sent a week ago:

Collisions of protons with energies about 1 TeV can lead to MAGNETIC collapse and explosion of Earth with probability about 30%. Thus, you can kill me and my relatives.

Please, advice me, what can I do to stop you:

1) To kill some citizens from your countries?
2) To kill myself in front of your Embassy?
3) ???

Ivan Gorelik. darkenergy@yandex.ru
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
+7 (8)965 372 00 36

Calm down, gentlemen. I am not able to kill anybody. I wrote this in order to make you think: what are you doing.


December, 6, 2009. 06.30 GMT.

CERN started collisions of protons with energy 0.45 TeV per proton. Both beams have four bunches of protons.

If magnetic moment of x-boson equal to magnetic moment of proton this energy is sufficient to create the microscopic magnetic hole.

It is needed from 1000 seconds to 1000 days to destroy the Earth. Let’s wait and see.

If we’ll survive now, CERN will add the quantity of bunches per beam and will raise the energy of collisions.

CERN started the experiment despite the courts and our appeals. CERN is terrorist organization.

Most of physicists are coward, or stupid, or smug, not able to understand where this experiment will lead us.


December, 5, 2009.
At last, the news about the most dangerous thing, which can be created at LHC, was published in well-known media edition. 'Doctor Dark Energy': The Ultimate LHC eccentric? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/04/dr_dark_energy/

At the end of the article the author try to calm the readers that LHC will collide protons with the energy only about 450 GeV.

But the calculation (two independent approaches) gives us the value about 250 GeV.

Indeed, that is smaller than the collision energy of Tevatron. But is it possible to create a magnetic hole at Tevatron, colliding protons and antiprotons? Magnetic field in the central point between these flying by particles is equal to zero, B = 0. But at the LHC B = 2B1.

That is smaller than the energy of cosmic rays. But look at my model with two 10-kg bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.

The 250 GeV energy per colliding proton was already achieved at RHIC. Experimentalists could see collapses – fireballs – about four years ago. It is possible that those fireballs are experimental proves of magnetic holes. Those holes evaporated immediately because the RHIC collided heavy nuclei, containing many protons and neutrons. Will such holes evaporate at LHC, or will created magnetic holes begin to capture the slowly moving protons of Earth?

One of the authors of documents about the safety of LHC, Igor Tkachev, is 100% confident that at the center of our Galaxy there is a huge black hole.
I am 95 % confident that at the center of our Galaxy there is a huge magnetic hole. I think that magnetic hole, besides the magnetic field, has axial-symmetric gravity field, stretching mostly in the plane of our Galaxy. This explains the huge velocities of peripheral stars of our Galaxy. In other words, - there is no any dark matter in our Universe. Its role is performed by magnetic holes. There is no any dark energy in our Ever Young Universe. Its role is performed by cosmic background radiation. Hubble constant is not the parameter of Universe expansion, but the angular frequency of 4-d rotation of Universe. 13.34 billion years is not the age of Universe, but the time of one full 4-d rotation of Ever Young Universe. Energy sources of stars in Ever Young Universe are different from the sources in Big Bang Universe. Our energy sources can be described by corrected formula of Hawking. This formula must contain the square root from Dirac’s big number. This formula describes the luminosity of stars, but not the black holes evaporation. In our model there are no black holes, but there can be extremely rapid gravity collapses, ending by disappearance of gravity funnel and huge gamma-burst. Gravity collapse is the final part of magnetic collapse if the mass of the magnetic hole is sufficient and if its configuration is correspondent.

Astronomers, show me, please, black holes.
No?
But, I can to show you the picturesque magnetic hole.
Here it is:

Magnetic holes explain us the cause of several astronomical pulses: gamma-bursts, huge radio jets, the annihilation lines of electron-positron pairs, huge velocities of remnants of cosmic catastrophes, the absence of civilizations which are older, than those, who can build powerful colliders.

People, please, stop powerful colliders immediately.
Collisions with energy, more than 100 GeV must be banned by international law, otherwise our Solar system will look like SN 1987A.

Somebody asks: Is it possible you are wrong with your theories. Is it possible?

If I was not confident, I would not fear LHC, I would sleep calmly, but, as can you see, I am in shock now.

Somebody asks: How have you determined, with such certainty, that your right?
You still have provided no proof at all that you are correct.


Two mathematical proves. Dozen of supplementary arguments.

Somebody asks: Is it possible that you are overly fearful and that scaring the public is a irresponsible, immoral and unethical thing to do if you have no proof at all of your theories?

I said the truth. Are bigbangers responsible and honest in their gaining the ruling position in science? Look at the open letter of anti bigbangers, signed by thousand of famous scientists, who are rejected the idea of Big Bang: http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
There is no pluralism in science now. Science was transformed into religious dogma by bigbangers. Because of this I have no job in science. Because of this the Earth can undergo the big bang, but this bang will not prove the Big Bang theory.

People, please, stop powerful colliders immediately.
Collisions with energy, more than 100 GeV must be banned by international law.


Send police to CERN and arrest Rolf Heuer and all his bigbangers. He is deadly dangerous for all humanity. He can kill you today with great probability.

December 2, 2009 I have delivered petition to the Prosecutor’s Office of Russia.


To Prosecutor’s Office of Russia.
From Ivan Gorelik (address, phone, passport data)
Statement


1. Please bring to criminal responsibility the authors of documents on the Large Hadron Collider Safety Assessment, because these documents contain crude errors and false statements. See Annex 1.
2. Please contact the law enforcement bodies of the European Union and demand the immediate termination of the experiment at the Collider, since the experiment could lead to the magnetic collapse and to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
Grounds:
A. 20 November 2009 an international committee ConCERNed filed a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights in Geneva to stop the experiment at the Collider, but CERN continues experiment and increase the energy of collisions and their frequency. http://www.lhc-concern.info/
B. Physicists of CERN considered only four items of dangerous objects that can be created at the collider, and ignored the theory of magnetic holes. I have repeatedly appealed to higher authorities about the danger of magnetic holes. Calculation of magnetic holes is shown here: http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
3. I beg to bring to the United Nations the issue of an international ban on the collision of particles with energies higher than 0.1 TeV.

December 2, 2009. Signature.
Annex on three sheets from my page Russian language page Crude Errors and Lie in the Safety Assessment of Collider. http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezru.html English language analog of this page you can find here: http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html


November, 30. CERN had risen up the energies of beams to 1.18 TeV.
I wrote a following letter to some leaders of CERN:

Collisions of protons with energies about 1 TeV can lead to MAGNETIC collapse and explosion of Earth with probability about 30%. Thus, you can kill me and my relatives.

Please, advice me, what can I do to stop you:

1) To kill some citizens from your countries?
2) To kill myself in front of your Embassy?
3) ???

Ivan Gorelik. darkenergy@yandex.ru
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
+7 (8)965 372 00 36


November 28, we  widespread a Leaflet of protest.


November 27 at 12.00 I and my son tried to held the meeting of protest near the Moscow State University. At 12.30 we were taken into police office, where we continued to protest for about 4 hours. At last militia had made our photos from different positions, took our finger-prints, returned our megaphone-siren and wished us a success in our straggle.


First collisions were performed, November 23.
Now CERN is ready to rise up the energy of collisions.
------------------------------------
Today, November 24, I'll try to organize a meeting of protest against CERN.
Moscow, Zubovskij bulvar, 4. Near the Russian Informational Agency "Novosti".


STOP CERN! A call to reasonable people all over the world.

In a several days the first high energy collisions of protons will be implemented by CERN at Large Hadron Collider. This can lead to the explosion of our planet and to extermination of our humankind.
We, citizens of Russia, Byelorussia and Ukraine, are planning to fulfill several actions. We call you to make the same in your countries.
1. The 20-th of November 2009 we’ll start to distribute the Leaflet in order to say people about the real deadly danger of the LHC experiment.
2. The 23-rd of November we’ll try to block the entrances to the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow State University and so on. No one person can enter these buildings until authorities of these organizations would say at media about their rejection and ban of the experiment.
3. The 29-th of November, that is a day before the first planned collisions, we’ll perform another action. The essence of this action we’ll be expounded additionally.
This plan will be canceled any day, if CERN leaders we’ll refuse the LHC experiment.
We were forced to go to these extreme measures. Previously, we have repeatedly made more loyal measures: appealed to the superior authorities, but CERN continues to go ahead and can kill us very soon. We can not sit silently for our execution.
November 16, 2009.
1. Ivan Gorelik, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html
2. Vasiliy Golota, http://n-t.ru/tp/ng/ps.htm
3. Vladimir Acjucovskij, http://www.atsuk.dart.ru 
4. Evgeniy Dovgel, http://dovgel.com/kvv.htm
5. Valentina Golovina.
6. Julia Polognjuk.
7. Sergey Vertinskij.
8. Tatiana Pravdina.
9. Vyacheslav Satane.
10. Nikolay Ermolajev.


Dogs of CERN’s Boss threatened to put me into jail.

Yesterday (several days ago) some man, possibly from Rolf Heuer environment, had phoned me and asked – did I threaten to Heuer. The conversation was ended by the threat to put me into jail and by saying that our phone conversation was recorded.

Dear CERN leaders, I feel myself as a prisoner, sentenced to be killed. Those are you, who already deadly scared many citizens of the whole Earth. They, probably, feel themselves as doomed to death. We do not know exactly the day when you will shoot us, and we do not know will we survive.

Our feelings of fear are different. These feelings depend from the probability, which some person gives to catastrophic scenario. Year ago, September 2008, I thought that the probability of the global catastrophe, caused by LHC, is hidden somewhere in the region 10^-6-10^-5. That was not so scary; - this risk probability is analogues to die in an air plane catastrophe. This probability did give me the possibility to sleep quite calmly. But in the period of the last year I had developed the theory of magnetic hole. My probability value of global catastrophe had grown almost each week, because I received dozens of proving arguments and two independent mathematical proves. I studied CERN’s documents about safety of LHC and found there three crude errors and lie assertions. Now I know that probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is not 10^-31, as it follows from CERN documents, but it is hidden somewhere in the region 5-90%. Do you understand this value? Can I sleep calmly now? Who are you now in my eyes, potential killer?

So, Rolf Heuer, go on, send your dogs here, into my town.
My anger grows every day with the nearing of the day of proton collisions at LHC.
I do not know what I’ll do in the end of November.
I hate you, your CERN, your countries authorities.
(...)

Application.

November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer space.

I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not happen;
C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
30% I leave to my mistake.

Why is such confidence?

Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole:
GMm / r = mc^2 / 2;
pB = mc^2.

It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is reachable at the energies of modern colliders, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html 
It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html 

The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If the second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But then it would not save you already, because magnetic holes would already grow inside the Earth.

Here is explanation of the most visible crude error, made in 2003 safety article.

1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = 1 m.
Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m.
How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the object?

Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.

2. How many Earth’s protons will be ruined by dangerous particle, if R/r = 10^9?

A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18.
B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, the trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight line, but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a result the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where: N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created dangerous particles.

Another crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation, is in equating of the consequences of protons collisions at LHC with collisions of cosmic particles with atmospheric ones.

To see the drastic difference between such consequences, let’s make two thought experiments.
There are two 10 kg bottles with neutrons.
Additional requirements, used in the model: 1. free neutrons do not decay; 2. proton do not capture neutron; 3. any nuclei, heavier than proton, can capture free neutron; 4. neutrons do not interact with the matter of bottle; 5. the density of neutrons in the bottle is the same as of water.

A. Let somebody put one slowly moving nucleus into the bottle. Neutrons will begin to be captured by the growing and dividing nuclei. In a couple of moments this laboratory will be exploded a town will look like Hiroshima after the nuclear attack.
B. If somebody will bombard the same bottle by nuclei, having the kinetic energy about several TeV, he will see that nuclei are ruined in collisions and formed a cloud of protons and neutrons.

A. Approximate way of reactions can look like this dividing chain:
He3+n -> He4;
He4+n -> He5;
He5+n -> He6 -> Li6+e;
Li6+n -> Li7;
Li7+n -> Li8 -> Be8+e;
Be8+n -> Be9;
Be9+n -> Be10;
...
U235+n -> X+Y+2n
X+n ->...; Y+n ->...
two branches;
...
four branches;
...
eight branches;
...
Collaptical explosion!

B. Nuclei with TeV kinetic energy will be ruined by high energy collisions with neutrons in the backward order in crude approximation.

Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic forces of protons. That is way, I named nuclei by “nuclear quasi-holes”.
Magnetic collapse has no limit. Magnetic hole will grow till there is the food, - the matter of planet or star.

The biggest error of CERN physicists is in the equating the consequences of A and B.
A. Collisions of protons at LHC;
B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.

Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make microscopic magnetic holes.

Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter are drastically great.
A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities, such as slow nucleus entered into the neutron-bottle, and exploded the town.
B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have relativistic velocities, such as TeV nuclei, destructed in the neutron-bottle.

Result:
A. LHC’s holes will capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth.
B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes will be ruined almost immediately. Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. Physicists observe such showers.

In our upper model with two neutron-bottles we could see that bombardment of bottle by eV-nuclei can lead to Hiroshima-like explosion, but TeV-nuclei bombardment are safe. Correspondingly LHC-collisions can destroy the Earth; cosmic-atmospheric particle collisions occur constantly and safe.

Most of physicists are confident that heavy particles, created at LHC will decay.
That is a deadly error.

LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than the mass of proton.

To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.

Imagine what will happen, if biologists would make a creature with the mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a thin film and pushed deep into the ground.

Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same size.
What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting protons?
Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the drop.

Particle physicists think that proton consists from three point-like quarks (u, u, d). In fact, proton can be composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro-magneto-weak poles (u, u, d). In a strong magnetic field this three-pole construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.

There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed energy would also be different.

We know two types of explosions: chemical and nuclear. Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical. At nuclear explosion only a few thousand’s parts of explosive rest energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of fragments. At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of the star is released in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of the rejected stellar shell. What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole?
Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider?
My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.

LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions are waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer space?

The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. The strength of magnetic field in this region is about 1016 teslas. Because of the strong magnetic interaction, this small magnetic hole will move on spiral trajectory to the Sun. As a result, the Sun will explode and astronomy amateurs from neighbor stellar systems (alien free thinkers) will observe novae or supernovae phenomenon. Alien stephen hawkings will say: “The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible happens”

The next crude error of CERN physicists is hidden in the formula of magnetic* catalyses of proton decay

M + p = M + e+.

More correct formula must contain the number n:

M{n} + p = M{n+1} + e+.

This number shows the number of x-bosons in magnetic hole. These bosons have the equal quantum numbers. Magnetic hole works as laser. The word “laser” originated as an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Laser creates the same photons, which are bosons with zero mass energy. Because of zero mass, photons fly away from laser with the speed of light. Magnetic trap creates x-bosons, which have non-zero rest mass. These bosons do not fly away but becomes the constituent part of magnetic hole. The bigger is the number n – the bigger is the rate of magnetic collapse of ordinary matter into magnetic hole.

* Physicist usually say: “monopole catalyses of proton decay”, I say that magnetic hole is magnetic dipole and M in my upper formulas denotes magnetic dipole.

According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 17, 2009, 51% of respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!

 

 


 

NORMALIZED UNITS


It is supposed in this work that there exist three types of 4-dimensional rotation in the Universe.

  • Rotation of Universe as a whole. Let's name it grand or universal rotation. Don't mix this grand 4-d rotation with usual three dimensional rotation. One full grand rotation takes time: T=1/H. We'll denote it ROT.
  • Most hard to imagine, but nevertheless existing 4-d rotation on our scale of space-time. This rotation reduces non isotropic space-time lattice to isotropic. Observable time becomes here as a successive set of "flashes" - materialization of a matter after every full space-time "flash", or middle rotation. Space and time intervals, and frequencies are measured here in the same units, - "flashes", or "steps", or middle rotations. Let's denote this new unit by "!".
  • Rotation of space-time in the microworld. This rotation is described by Planck constant and by the most massive stabile particle - proton. One full rotation here corresponds to the Compton wave length of proton. Let's denote this unit osc (oscillation).

1 ROT = N !, 1! = N osc, 1 ROT = N2 osc, !2 = sqr(ROT*osc)

In order to simplify relations between values we'll introduce mass of proton pr as unit of mass, and charge of an electron e as unit of charge.

We don't know the exact geometry of the real Universe. So, we can speak about it's space-time coordinates only with some approximation. Today, it is clear, that in the present geometrical model of Universe, the coordinates of 4-d lattice are almost closed, i.e., after finishing one full rotation about the Universe, the coordinate axis-circumference is not closed, but passes close to initial point, - about the Compton wavelength of proton. By taking this into account, we can write that the length of one quasi spire is defined through velocity of light and Hubble constant as:

X = c/H (1)

The length of time quasi spire is:

T = 1/H (2)

H - Hubble constant. Observations give for it H = 70 +/- 15 km/s/Mpc. In this work the following result was received: H= 73.29 km/s/Mpc, and after corrections of units H = 2.375E-18 ROT/s. The length of space and time spires of Universe are: X= 1.262E+26 m/ROT, T = 4.210E+17 s/ROT or T = 13.34 mlrd.years/ROT.

The expressions (1), (2) are valid in 4-d lattice from the point of view of macroscopic observer, i.e., relatively us and our units. In this units the lattice looks non symmetrically, - three quasi spires numerically are big, the fourth is shorter by "c" times. By making the turn inside the lattice, we at the same time make equal all quasi spires. (To say the truth, the macroscopic life is impossible under such angles, because there will be no difference between proton, electron, photon, neutrino, because there will no be time with all thermodynamics, and no accumulation of information.) Nevertheless the microscopic life is possible there and we can assume that the length of all quasi spires are equal to each other and numerically are equal to some universal quantum number.

X' = Y' = Z' = T' = N (3)

" ' "- denotes new normalized values of our Universe. At first N was received from expression N = sqr(c2mpr/(Hh), but the precision of Hubble constant was not sufficient, and latter the N was received more precisely through another expressions. Now we have N = 3.091E+20 !/ROT.

Here is the system of equations with which we can receive exact values of quantities.

  1. The connection of quantum number N, with the length of space X and time T quasi spires of Universe, with velocity of light c, Hubble constant H, boundary frequency n0, boundary wave length l0 and boundary time interval t0 in SI: N=Tn0, N=X/l0, X = c/H, T = 1/H, t0 = 1/n0.
  2. The same connection in Normalizes Units (NU): N=X'=T'=1/H'.
  3. Connection with mimimum H and maximum mprc2/h frequencies in the Universe: N=sqr(mprc2/hH),
  4. Connection with ratio of forces: N = sqr(ap(fel/fgr)e-e), where (fel/fgr)e-e is the ratio of electric to gravity interaction between two electrons; a - fine structure constant.

Note: In the summer 1999, the precision of all recommended values was changed by CODATA. Only one of the main constants had become less precise, -- gravity constant. It was changed from 6.67259(85)E-11 to 6.673(10)E-11, or in form, used in this work: from 6.67259E-11 to 6.673E-11 in SI units. In this work a very interesting numerical coincidence was found for normalized gravity constant G' = 1/Exp(a+1/a) and, as a result, we received very precise G = 6.671479888E-11. It does not influence on the main results of normalization of units, but great precision of G helps us to see more clearly the beauty of normalized units. So if hypothesis G' = 1/Exp(a+1/a) will be erroneous, then precision of some bottom results will be less. Like: from 6.671479888E-11 to 6.673E-11. This will not change the main results of normalization.

Let's introduce the main coefficients of re-count of space and time quantities from SI to NU, and coefficients of re-count of mass and charge. The unit of mass in NU is the mass of proton. The unit of charge in NU is the elementary charge.

Connected quantity Coefficient of re-count Value of SI unit in NU
Time t0 = 1.362402672E-03 s/! 1 s = 733.9973861 !
Length l0 = 408438.0458 m/! 1 m = 2.44863066E-06 !
Mass km = 1.67262158E-27 kg/pr 1 kg = 5.978638624E+26 pr
Charge q = 1.602176462E-19 C/e 1 C = 6.2415097445E+18 e

Let's introduce coefficients for re-count of frequencies:

Frequency of oscillations in zt n0 = 733.9973861 !*Hz 1Hz (oscill/s) = 1.362402672E-03 1/! (oscill./flash)
Frequency of rotations in xy n0 = 733.9973861 !/s 1/s (rot/s) = 1.362402672E-03 1/! (rot/flash)

Velocity of light is dimensionless in NU and equals to one: c' = c/(l0n0) = 299792458m/s/(408438.0458 m/!*733.9973861 !/s) = 1

Hubble constant:

H'=1/T'=1/N = 2.032783924E-21(universal rotation / flash) = 3.235276097E-21 ROT/! (4)

(H*(2p))' = 2.032783924E-20 (universal radian / flash) = 2.032783924E-20 RAD/! (4.a)

In SI units Hubble constant will be interpreted as angular velocity of light: H = 2.374684198E-18 (universal rotation / second) = 2.374684198E-18 (ROT/s), H*(2p) = 1.492058087E-17 (universal radian / second) = 1.492058087E-17 (RAD/s).

Normalized unit of force will be proton-force or pr-force or pr/!: 1pr-force =1pr*1!/1!/1!= 1pr/!. 1N = 1kg*1m/1s2/ 1.67262158E-27 kg/pr / 408438.0458 m/! * (1.362402672E-03 s/!)2 = 2.716984040E+15 pr/!, (or 1N =2.716984040E+15 pr-force.

kF=3.680551617E-16 N/pr-force (or in N*!/pr) (5)

Normalized unit of energy is also proton: 1 J = (1kg*1m2/1s2)/km /l02*t02 = 6652132600 pr or 1 pr = 1.503277310E-10J.

kE = 1.503277310E-10 J/pr (6)

The Planck constant will be:

h' = {h}(J*s/osc) * {n0}(!/s) / {kE}(J/pr)  = 3.235276097E-21 pr*!/osc (7)

(h/(2p))' = {h/(2p)}(J*s/rad) * {n0}(!/s) / {kE}(J/pr)  = 5.149101831E-22 pr*!/rad (7.a)

Compton wavelength of proton:

lpr = h / (mprc) = 1.321409846E-15 m/osc (8)

lpr' = {lpr}(m/osc) / l0(m/!) = 3.235276097E-21 !/osc (8.a)

(lpr/2p)' = {lpr/2p}(m/rad) / l0(m/!)= 5.149101831E-22 !/rad (8.b)

Gravity constant G in normalized form:

G' = {G}(m3ROT/(s2kg))*({t0}(s/!))2*{km}(kg/pr)/({l0}(m/!))3 = 3.039850897E-60 !*ROT/pr (9)

(The course of intrusion of ROT in the gravity constant will be explain later)

As a result we have long and not finished yet chain of numerical exact equalities:

{X'}={Y'}={Z'}={T'}=1/{h'}=1/{H'}=1/v0'=1/{l'pr}=1/{f'}={N}=3.090926308E+20 (10)

where f' is quantum of force, and v0' is quantum of velocity of particle's link (quark).

Quantum of force and graviton energy.

Energy of fluctuations must have symmetry form from both sides of the boundary frequency. Such for fluctuation, lying in the electromagnetic region, or simply, for photon, we have:

E = hn = hc/l (11)

Correspondingly, the energy of fluctuation, lying in the space-gravity region, or simply, for graviton, must be defined through:

E = fl = fc/n (12)

where f is quantum of force, defined from the condition of correctness of both formulas at the border: Quantum of force must play the same role in gravity region, as quantum of action plays in electromagnetic region.

E0=hn0=hc/l0=(hc/l02)l0 (13)

f = hc/l02 (14)

After substituting of dates and using equations osc/!=!/ROT, !2=osc*ROT, we'll receive:

f = {h}(J*s/osc)*{c}(m/s)/({l0}(m/!))2 = 1.190760067E-36 N*ROT

After multiplying the last by 2p (RAD/ROT) we'll receive analogue to hbar:

f*2p = 7.481766157E-36 N*RAD (14.a)

We can take ratio of action quantum to force quantum:

h/f=556.4570849 (J*s/osc) / (N*ROT), or m*s/!2 (15)

h/(f*2p)=88.56289567 (J*s/osc) / (N*RAD), or m*s/(osc*RAD) or m*s/(osc*RAD) (15.a)

(h/2p)/(f*2p)=14.09522262 (J*s/rad) / (N*RAD), or m*s/(rad*RAD) (15.b)

Expression (15) is equal to: l0/n0 = 556.4570849 (m/!)/(!/s), or m*s/!2 (16)

Expression (15.b) quite strangely connects time, linear, angular quantities in SI and NU: 1radNU = sqr(14.09522262 m*s) = 3.7543604810(m*s)1/2

In normalized units the quantum of force is equal to 1/N pr*ROT/!.

Normalization of electric units.

Electric constant, or permittivity, e0 can be received from the expression for elementary charge: e=sqr(2ae0hc), or: e'=sqr(2ae0'h')

e0'=e'2/(2ah')=N/(2a) e2osc/(pr*!) = 2.117840884E+22 e2osc/(pr*!) (17)

The tests of dimensions in different expressions had shown, that dimensions of constants of interactions are dependent of units ROT or osc. For dimensions of gravity constant we have [G] = 1kg*s2*ROT/m3. We can conclude that G, H are dependent of the angle of rotation in lattice of Universe. But it is supposed in this work that the angle does not dependent of time. Our situation in universal space-time lattice is analogues to the height of a running squirrel in rotating while.

Precision of values N, H, l0, n0, t are defined by the precision of gravity constant G. But it's precision is the smallest among main constants. If we take combinations of N, H, l0, n0, t with G, then precision will be much bigger, for example:

G=6.673E-11 ROT*m3/(kg*s2), H=2.375E-18 ROT/s, G/H=2.809417729E+7 m3/kg/s (18)

G/H can be interpreted as a specific "swallowing" of material space by ponderable matter.

Permeability of free space in normalized units can be received from: c=1/sqr(e0m0), 1=1/sqr(e0'm0'), m0'=1/e0'.

m0'= 2a/N = 4.721790044E-23 pr*!/osc/e2 (19)

Impedance for vacuum in SI is Z0=sqr(m0/e0)=376.730313461771 Ohm, and in norm. units it is:

Z'=sqr(m0'/e0')=m0'=2a/N= 4.721790044E-23 pr*!/osc/e2 (20)

Extremely urgent note, 2009.

Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!

There is a very big probability that magnetic trap will kill us all, if we will not stop powerful colliders.

Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop / liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ...

It is probable that the microscopic magnetic trap can be created at the collider. Magnetic trap will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic trap can destroy the Earth.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic analog of the black hole. The black hole is bonded by gravitational forces, and the magnetic hole is bonded by magnetic forces, which are many-many times stronger than gravity forces.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic dipole, and can have the form of a torus, ellipsoid or cylinder, dependently of a matter distribution around it and its magnetic properties. Inside the hole there is the critical magnetic field, about 1016 teslas. The lines of magnetic induction are directed perpendicular to the plane of the hole. Nucleons are microscopic magnets, and they can be easily captured by the critical field of the hole. Proton decays at x-boson and positron. Neutron decays at x-boson and antineutrino. Positrons and antineutrino are ejected from the hole; x-bosons are captured and the is growing.

The approximate computation shows that the minimal possible magnetic hole, which can capture a nucleon, has a mass about 340 of masses of nucleons. The Tevatron collider is now working above this region (1 TeV). Creation of magnetic holes at Tevatron was impossible for two reasons:
1. Collision of a proton and an antiproton leads to annihilation;
2. In the center of the line, connecting the proton and antiproton, facing a tangent, the magnetic field is zero.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will be able to create the particles with the rest mass, which are dozens times more that the minimal possible mass of magnetic hole.

For several years, some scientists argue and demand to ban the construction of powerful colliders. Among the known dangerous objects that may lead to global catastrophe are the following: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic monopoles, vacuum bubbles. I learned about these disputes and concerns only in early September 2008. And then I immediately noticed that the objects, bonded by magnetic forces, were almost not analyzed.

In early September 2008, I assumed that the probability of a global catastrophe is less than 0.000001. However, after analysis of the objects, bonded by magnetic forces; after the analysis of space observations; after I found crude errors in the LHC safety documents, my assessment of the global disaster has surpassed dozens of percents.

Some theorists suggest that the Higgs bosons will be registered at the LHC. And, if these particles will not been found, the theorists would be very surprised; - this would prove that the Standard Model is wrong. Higgs boson had received a new name, "the God particle". We know that the most of particles have their corresponding antiparticles. So, if there is a particle of God, then there is a particle of Devil. Two colliding particles can give two more massive particles, - the particle and its antiparticle, for example, an electron and positron. By adding the colliding energy, we can get the God particle and its anti-particle, the magnetic trap of Devil. Particles and antiparticles have diametrically opposed properties. Indeed, the Higgs boson causes the ordinary matter to have a mass. But the magnetic hole captures the substance and transforms its rest mass-energy into another form of matter, - the magnetic field of the Devil's trap. Say me now, have we the right to touch the particle of God?

Microscopic magnetic holes created at the collider, will move to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. Eventually they will merge together into a single and much stronger magnetic hole. The thin shell of the Earth, together with us, will be ejected into cosmic space, but the rest of the Earth will turn into an electric current loop of several meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is 9 millimeters. 2/3 of Earth’s mass will be transformed into magnetic field of magnetic hole, and another 1/3 will be transformed into radiation and kinetic energy of the rejected shell.

Magnetic hole will not decay if it was born in such cold place, as the collider, where the temperature is close to 0 K. If the magnetic hole is born in a collision of space particle with atmospheric particle, it has a speed, which is close to the speed of light. As a result, such magnetic hole will be ruined almost immediately as a result of energetic collisions with atmospheric particles. Such ruined magnetic hole will form a cosmic-ray particle shower. Such showers are observable.

Huge magnetic holes are also observable is cosmos.

In the remnants of supernova SN 1987A we can see a system of rings, which remind us the magnetic hole. What quantum number had divided the ejected particles at these three rings?

It seems as if these rings embrace a hyperboloid. And now look at the electron, moving along two hyperboles in coordinates x, ict, in my electron model program. Each electron crosses the entire Universe in a period of time, which is equal to the classical period of the electron. This paradoxical conclusion is the consequence of the Special Relativity Theory. The ring structure of SN 1987A and our electron model have common visible properties. The Earth and the Sun can be turned into the same ring structure.

Magnetic collapse is much more rapid than the gravity collapse. At the process of magnetic collapse the nucleon turns such, that its magnetic dipole moment becomes parallel to the magnetic dipole moment of a trap. Gravity collapse needs displacing of a matter inside the Schwarzschild radius. The time interval of neutrino registration at neutrino observatories had proved the reality of magnetic collapse of dying stars.

Now (December 2009) I am very confident that there are no black holes in the Universe. But gravitational collapses are possible and observable as powerful Gamma Rays Bursts (GRBs). At the moment then mh’s and bh’s radii become equal, the rapid gravity collapse changes the magnetic collapse. Gravity funnel becomes thinner and disappear. Collapse ends by gamma rays burst and flattening the space, without any black hole formed. The energy of gamma burst can be about 2/3 of mc^2 of exploded star. A small fraction of matter, which was able to survive, moves out from the place of explosion with high velocity.

Pulsars are not the neutron stars, but magnetic holes surrounded by dense neutron shells. Neutrons have negative magnetic moments and as a result they are repealed out from the magnetic hole, but attracted to the hole by its huge gravity forces. So the neutron shell is situated at the region where the magnetic and gravitational forces are equal.

Magnetic holes explain us the cause of several astronomical pulses: gamma-bursts, huge radio jets, the annihilation lines of electron-positron pairs, huge velocities of remnants of cosmic catastrophes, the absence of civilizations which are older, than those, who can build powerful colliders.

Several days ago (December 9, 2009) an article was published, - gamma rays bursts are bourn in strong magnetic fields. That is one more proving argument of magnetic holes. Huge Cosmic Explosions Fueled by Magnetism http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/091209-gamma-ray-burst-magnet.html

Particle's collision energies and bombs:

Several eV - chemical bomb;
Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
Several TeV - hyper bomb.

Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of matter.
Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of matter.
Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a field.

Scientific crime.

Only crazy people can try to create the particles with the rest mass, more than 100 nucleon masses. It is very possible that in the region from 100 to 7000 aum, hundreds types of particles and resonances can be created. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of them will grow, capturing and destroying the ordinary matter.

Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in the strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron stars can have any masses. My approximate computation also shows that the minimal possible neutron star can have a mass, about three hundreds of nucleon masses. Such embryo of neutron star can by made in collider.

Not long ago (autumn 2008) the new strange unexpected particle was discovered at the Tevatron collider. It decays at several muons, up to eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I named it the muon hole. What will be made the next? The magnetic trap of Devil? It will not decay, but it will transform us into its magnetic field.

Majority of contemporary physicists imagine quark-gluon plasma as a suck with peas. That is a very dangerous imagination. Particles are not points with labels, where their quantum properties were written. Particles are not the material essences, independent of space-time; they are just space-time elements, strings. 

Dear reader, the situation is extremely serious. The physics now is in the deep crisis. Theorists, in order to save their religious Big Bang theory, invented “the dark energy" as a new either. They want now to test their wretched theories at the powerful Large Hadron Collider.

Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime now. The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials. The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us. Scientists-criminals must be punished. But they continue to lie about the safety of the LHC, and are performing the global terrorist crime now.

Dear reader! Big Bang adherents can lead the Earth to the utter destruction. Particle collisions with the energy more then 0.1 TeV must be prohibited by the international law. The science must be cleared from the Big Bang delusion. Big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. People, will you silently endure the massacre?

Here is not complete list of your potential killers: 2003 J.-P. Blaizot, J. Iliopoulos, J. Madsen, G.G. Ross, P. Sonderegger, H.-J. Specht. 2008 John Ellis, Gian Giudice, Michelangelo Mangano, Igor Tkachev, and Urs Wiedemann. And of course, Rolf Heuer, director of CERN, who neglects the opinion of physicists, saying  about dangers of LHC.

The crudest error, made by them, is equating of the consequences of collider collisions with cosmo-atmospheric collisions. To see the difference between these consequences look my model with two 10-kg bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC
collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.

Here are some CERN addresses. Write them and demand to stop the Collider. Otherwise they kill us all with probability about several dozens of percents.

rolf.heuer@cern.ch, cern.reception@cern.ch, visits.service@cern.ch, press.office@cern.ch, john.ellis@cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk@cern.ch

rudiger.voss@cern.ch, patricia.mage@cern.ch, felicitas.pauss@cern.ch, external.relations@cern.ch, council-president@cern.ch, fc-chairman@cern.ch, spc-chairman@cern.ch, scientific-secretary@cern.ch, council-secretariat@cern.ch

Here are some phones of your potential killers:

CERN CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland. +41 22 76 761 11
Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire F-01631 CERN Cedex France Telephone Switchboard: +41 22 76 761 11 Central Fax: +41 22 76 765 55
Visitors Reception. Telephone number:+41 22 76 766 49
Visits Service. Telephone number: +41 22 767 8484, Fax: +41 22 767 8710
Press Office. Telephone number: 41 22 767 3432 / 2141 Fax: +41 22 785 0247

Stop global suicide!


Some documents and links.

Crude errors in the LHC safety documents. What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?

Letter to the President of Russia

Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation.

You can read some my letters, which were send to the Google groups, - just click my Google-profile. I was already forbidden there and now registered there under another nick, Magnetic. Read for example my thread The huge field of growing magnetic hole will accelerate us so quickly, that we will overtake Voyagers.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bbe5fa04aaa37982?hl=en#

Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations.

Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations.

Arguments,

Magnetic Hole. Pictures.


News Links


This column was written about a year ago. Last updated the 13-th of December 2009.

 

Summary table

  Value in SI Re-count Value in NU
Quantum number N N=T*n0, N=X/l0, N=sqr(mprc2/hH), N=sqr(ap(fel/fgr)e-e), N=3.090926308E+20 osc/!, !/ROT, sqr(osc/ROT) N'=N 3.090926308E+20 osc/!, !/ROT, sqr(osc/ROT)
Velocity of light c = 299792458 m/s c'=ct0/l0 1
Hubble constant H = 2.374684198E-18 ROT/s
73.275107 km/s/Mpc
H'=Ht0 = 1/N 3.235276097E-21 ROT/!
Compton wave length of proton lpr = h / (mprc) =1.321409847E-15 m/osc lpr' = lpr/l0 = 1/N 3.235276097E-21 !/osc
Compton frequency of proton npr = 2.268731830E+23 osc/s npr'=nprt0 =N 3.090926308E+20 osc/!
Planck constant h= 6.626068756E-34 J*s/osc h' = h/km/l02t0 = 1/N 3.235276097E-21 pr*!/osc
Electron mass mel= 9.109381876E-31 kg mel'=mel/km 1/1836.1526675 pr
Gravity constant G = 6.671479888E-11 ROT*m3/(kg*s2) G' = Gt02km/l03 ; G' =N/p2*df2/2 (independent hypothesis: G'= 1/Exp(a+1/a), or
2G'= 1/sh(
a+1/a), or
2G'= i/sin(i(
a+1/a)))
3.039850897E-60 !ROT/pr
Quantum of force f = hc/l02 = 1.190760067E-36 N*ROT or kg*m*ROT/s2 f' = ft02/(kml0) ={1/N} 3.235276097E-21 pr*ROT/!
Electric constant e0=8.85418782E-12 F/m, C2osc/(m2N) e0' =e'2/(2ah') = {N/(2a)} 2.117840884E+22 e2osc/!/pr
Magnetic constant m0=1/c2e0= 4p*E-7 Hn/(osc*m), s2N/(osc*C)2 m0' = 1/e0' = {2a/N} 4.721790044E-23 pr*!/osc/e2
Impedans of free space Z0=sqr(m0/e0) = 376.730313461771 Ohm/osc, m*s*N/(osc*C2) Z0' = sqr(m0'/e0') {2a/N} 4.721790044E-23 pr*!/osc/e2
Ratio of coefficients of interactions grav/el d = G4pe0 = 7.423022472E-21 C2ROT*osc/kg2, C2!2/kg2 d' = d*km2/ke2 8.090129511E-37 e2!2/pr2
Grav/el forces ratio between two protons dpp=d*mpr2/q2 = 8.090129511E-37 !2 dpp' = dpp 8.090129511E-37 !2
Grav/el forces ratio between proton and electron dpe=d*mpr*mel/q2 =4.406022252E-40 !2 dpe' = dpe 4.406022252E-40 !2
Grav/el forces ratio between two electrons dee=d*mel2/q2 = 2.399594723E-43 !2 dee' = dee = ap/N2 2.399594723E-43 !2

Meter or radian?

In SI we have seven base quantities: length (meter, m); mass (kilogram, kg); time (second, s); electric current (ampere, A); thermodynamic temperature (kelvin K); amount of substance (mole, mol); luminous intensity (candela, cd). Other quantities can be represented as additional quantities and derived quantities. Examples of additional quantities are: plane angle (radian, rad); solid angle (steradian, sr). Examples of derived quantities are: mass density (kilogram per cubic meter, kg/m3); energy (joule, J=N*m=m2*kg*s-2); power (watt, W=J/s=m2*kg*s-3); charge (coulomb, C=A*s); and so on. Plane and solid angle are dimensionless and this is the course of some confusion in the formulas with "rad" and "sr".

It is clear, that apparent disorder with units is bound to closed geometry. Such similar "disorder" exists in elementary math. For example, the length of arc, L, and the length of it's radius, r, are measured in "meters". The angle, j is measured in "radians". We have an equation:

L (m)=r (m) * j (rad) (21)

As a result we have 1m = 1m*1rad. Because of this correct/noncorrect equation we have two different Planck constant, related by the coefficient 2p but both measured in J*s.

We can change the approximate equation (21) by more precise with the help of bottom picture and constituting the fact, that in the real world there are no straight lines, there are no plane circles, there is no ideal Euclidean space.

Any circumference or circle we must always draw on the sphere of much more radius. So, from L=aj, a= rsiny, r=ry we can receive more precise formulae for the length of arc:

L=rjsiny/y, lim(siny/y)=1 rad-1, if y --» 0 rad, (22)

The equation (22) now is expressed without contradictions in units: m = m*rad/rad, siny = m/m. But to be correct to the end we must rewrite the expression, containing the radius of curvature r, in correct form: r=rysind/d. The result will be the same.

From the other hand the formulae L=rJ, where J = jsiny/y, can be regarded as correct, but in this case the quantity J must be named not angle, but the ratio of lengths. Correspondingly in formulae: r=rY, where Y=ysind/d, the quantity, denoted by big Y will be the ratio of arc length to radius length, but the quantity, denoted by small y is the angle of this arc, measured in radians.

Example transition from photon to graviton.

In the border n0 = 734 !/s the properties of oscillations are changed relatively us, macroscopioc observers, who live at the scale story between microworld and megaworld. At this frequency we must change space measurements on time measurement and visa verse. It is possible to do this in normalized units. For example, let's suppose, that "mirror reflection" of maximum of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) can give us the some maximum gravity spectrum. Then, transferring from usual units to normalized, and returning from normalized units to usual we'll have such chain of lines, where osc - electromagnetic oscillations, ROT - gravity oscillations:

grav. max --- border --- CMBR.max

---- x (Hz or ROT/s)-------- 734 !/s---- 2.82E+11 (Hz or osc/s)

--1/3.84E+8 ROT/!----------- 1 !/!---------- 3.84E+8 osc/!----

---1.91E-6 ROT/s-----------734 !/s--------2.82E+11 osc/s---

Last numerical value is the extremum gravity wavelength in the gravity spectrum. For the period of that wave we have:

T = 1/(1.687E-6 ROT/s)= 6.06 days/ROT

It is well known that Sun has whole spectrum of vibrations or periodicities, comparable to now received result. It seems that even origin of seven day humane week is not accidental. The weather on Earth has many periods like now received. Besides, the most widespread universe's "lighthouses" have the period close to this.

Planck values

In the bottom picture You can see the connections of Planck length with now received results in logarithmic scale. (Planck's time and mass one can receive through: tpl=lpl/c; npl=1/tpl; mpl=hnpl/c2)


df - el/grav forces ratio for:
pe - proton-electron, ee - electron-electron.


To index of Space Genetics.

Ivan Gorelik,


TopList